Chapter 5: Evaluating BCM System Effectiveness
This chapter focuses on the core objective of a BCM audit: evaluating the effectiveness of the Business Continuity Management (BCM) system.
It outlines key areas for assessment, ensuring a comprehensive review that identifies strengths and weaknesses in the organisation's preparedness for disruptions.
Core Principles for Evaluating BCM Effectiveness
An effective BCM program safeguards critical business functions (CBFs) and minimizes downtime during disruptions.
Here are the fundamental principles for evaluating BCM system effectiveness:
- Alignment with Standards and Regulations: The BCM program should align with established standards such as ISO 22301 and relevant industry-specific BCM regulations. This ensures adherence to best practices and regulatory requirements.
- Risk-Based Approach: The evaluation should prioritize areas with the highest potential for disruption, focusing on CBFs identified through risk assessments. This ensures resources are directed towards mitigating the most critical risks.
- Completeness and Accuracy of Documentation: All essential BCM documentation, including risk assessments, BIAs, BCM Plans, and testing records, should be present, up-to-date, and readily accessible. Documented procedures ensure consistent application of BCM practices.
- Clarity and Comprehensiveness of BCM Plans: BCM Plans should be clear and concise and cover all aspects of recovery for critical business functions. This includes defined roles and responsibilities, communication protocols, and activation procedures for the BCM Plan.
- Testing and Exercising: Regular testing and exercising of BCM Plans are crucial for identifying gaps and ensuring their effectiveness during a real-world disruption. The evaluation should assess the frequency and effectiveness of such testing programs.
- Management Commitment and Integration: Senior management should demonstrate a commitment to the BCM program. Integration with other organisational processes, such as risk management and incident response, is essential for overall preparedness.
Key Areas for Evaluation
Building upon the core principles, here are specific areas for in-depth evaluation during a BCM audit:
5.2.1 Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
- Comprehensiveness: Does the BIA consider all potential disruptions that could impact CBFs?
- Accuracy: Are the identified impacts on CBFs (financial losses, downtime) realistic and quantifiable?
- Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs): Are RTOs for CBFs clearly defined and achievable based on the BIA and available resources?
5.2.2 BCM Plans
- BCM Plan Content: Do BCM Plans outline clear steps for recovery of CBFs, including activation procedures, resource allocation, and communication protocols?
- BCM Plan Maintainability: Are BCM Plans updated with personnel, technology, or business process changes? Is a process in place to ensure BCM Plan maintainability?
- BCM Plan Accessibility: Are BCM Plans accessible to all authorised personnel needing them during a disruption?
5.2.3 Incident Response:
- Incident Response Procedures: Are documented procedures in place for identifying, responding to, and containing disruptions?
- Communication Plan: Does the BCM program include a clear communication plan for notifying stakeholders during and after a disruption?
- Training and Awareness: Have all relevant personnel received adequate training on BCM procedures and their roles during a disruption?
5.2.4 Testing and Exercising:
- Testing Frequency and Scope: Are BCPs tested regularly enough to ensure effectiveness? Does testing cover different scenarios and contingencies?
- Lessons Learned: Are lessons learned from BCP testing documented and incorporated into improving the BCM program?
- Post-Test Review: Is there a process for reviewing BCP testing exercises and identifying areas for improvement in the plans or procedures?
5.2.5 Management Commitment and Integration:
- Management Support: Does senior management demonstrate visible commitment and support for the BCM program?
- Resource Allocation: Are adequate resources (financial, personnel, time) allocated to maintain and continuously improve the BCM program?
- BCM Program Integration: Is the BCM program integrated with other relevant organizational processes, such as risk management and information security?
Summing Up ...
By systematically evaluating these key areas, auditors can comprehensively understand the BCM program's effectiveness.
This allows for the identification of strengths to be leveraged and weaknesses to be addressed.
Ultimately, a well-executed BCM audit provides valuable insights for enhancing the organisation's resilience and ensuring business continuity in the face of potential disruptions.
More Information About Blended Learning Auditing BCMS Courses
BCM Institute offers two levels of BCM auditing courses: A-3 BCM-8030 ISO22301 BCMS Auditor [A-3] and the ISO22301 BCMS Lead Auditor [A-5].
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |