[Business Continuity Strategy] [Template 1]
Introduction to Mitigation Strategies and Justification
As part of the Risk Analysis and Review (RAR) process within the Business Continuity Management (BCM) framework, this chapter outlines the Mitigation Strategies designed to manage and reduce the risks identified in earlier stages.
While previous chapters assessed threats, their likelihood, and impact on key areas of operations, this chapter focuses on how Tripartite Alliance Limited (TAL) can proactively address those threats through a combination of existing and additional controls.
Each threat is analysed in terms of its current risk rating and level, and matched with an appropriate risk treatment strategy, which could involve:
- Risk Avoidance – eliminating the source of the risk
- Risk Reduction – implementing controls to lower the likelihood or impact
- Risk Transference – shifting the risk to third parties
- Risk Acceptance – acknowledging the risk with contingency measures in place
The table in this chapter maps each threat to its existing controls, evaluates the residual risk, and proposes additional mitigation strategies.
A justification for each mitigation decision is also included to support clear and defensible planning decisions. This structured approach enables TAL to align risk treatment with organisational priorities and resource availability, ensuring that critical services can continue with minimal disruption.
Below is a comprehensive table for Tripartite Alliance Limited (TAL) outlining the Mitigation Strategies for each identified threat from Part 1: RAR – List of Threats.
This follows the structure and principles described in BCMPedia’s Mitigation Strategies.
Table: Mitigation Strategies for Tripartite Alliance Limited (TAL)
Threat |
Existing Controls |
Risk Rating |
Risk Level |
Risk Treatment (Residual Risk) |
Additional Mitigation Strategy |
Justification for Selected Mitigation Strategy |
Flood |
Elevated floor placement, drainage systems, and insurance |
12 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Install water barriers, conduct flood drills |
To ensure business access and prevent downtime due to localised flash floods |
Haze / Air Pollution |
Remote work, N95 mask stockpile, air purifiers |
12 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Real-time haze alert system, haze-specific WFH SOP |
To protect staff health and ensure continuity during poor air quality episodes |
Lightning & Thunderstorm |
Lightning protection systems, surge protectors, UPS |
12 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Include lightning audits and equipment testing |
To reduce downtime from power surges or damage caused by severe thunderstorms |
Civil Unrest / Riot |
Emergency evacuation plans, security coordination |
8 |
Medium |
Risk Acceptance |
Expand crisis communication protocols |
Risk is low, but communication is essential for safety and service coordination |
Terrorist Threat |
CCTV, access control, visitor logging |
5 |
Medium |
Risk Acceptance |
Conduct periodic security exercises with SPF and SCDF |
Though unlikely, response readiness is crucial due to potentially severe consequences |
Fire / Gas Leak Nearby |
Fire alarms, SCDF-compliant systems, and evacuation drills |
8 |
Medium |
Risk Reduction |
Strengthen coordination with building management |
Enhances response and reduces dependency on external systems during emergencies |
Pandemic / Disease Outbreak |
Remote work, health checks, safe distancing protocols |
15 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Update the infectious disease response SOP, ensure IT readiness for full remote |
To ensure continuity of services while protecting health and safety during long disruptions |
Public Transport Disruption |
Flexible hours, WFH options |
12 |
High |
Risk Acceptance |
Promote staggered shifts and monitor major MRT disruptions |
Occurs infrequently but can be mitigated with flexibility in work arrangements |
Labour Shortage |
Staff training, resource planning |
12 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Develop internal succession plans, engage more interns |
Ensures the availability of critical skillsets during a resource crunch |
IT Vendor Failure |
SLA with vendors, alternate support options |
12 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Identify backup vendors, integrate switchover protocol |
Prevents a single point of failure in IT support and systems |
Facilities Mgmt Breakdown |
Routine checks, vendor SLAs |
9 |
Medium |
Risk Reduction |
Establish emergency facility vendor contacts |
Ensures swift recovery of basic facility functions like access, utilities |
Training/Comms Vendor Delay |
Vendor review process, multiple facilitators |
9 |
Medium |
Risk Acceptance |
Pre-identify second-tier training vendors |
To ensure public outreach, training events, and campaigns proceed with minimal disruption |
Power Failure |
UPS for critical systems, backup generators |
12 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Implement critical system power restoration SOP |
Reduces impact on case management and internal systems |
Network Failure |
Network monitoring, single ISP setup |
16 |
Extreme |
Risk Reduction |
Implement dual-ISP connectivity |
Prevents major disruptions in online services and communications |
Cyberattack / Ransomware |
Endpoint protection, cybersecurity policy, and backups |
15 |
High |
Risk Reduction |
Implement zero-trust architecture, conduct annual audits |
Protects sensitive case data and ensures system integrity |
Hardware Failure |
Asset inventory, IT refresh cycle |
9 |
Medium |
Risk Acceptance |
Maintain a pool of standby workstations/laptops |
Ensures that operations resume quickly without waiting for new equipment |
Summing Up ...
The mitigation strategies presented in this chapter form a practical and forward-looking plan for enhancing the resilience of Tripartite Alliance Limited (TAL).
By identifying gaps in current controls and recommending additional actions, TAL strengthens its preparedness against a wide range of operational threats, including natural disasters, IT disruptions, people-related risks, and vendor dependencies.
The selected risk treatments—whether through reduction, acceptance, or transference—are tailored to the organisation’s mission, structure, and operating environment.
Importantly, the justification provided for each mitigation decision ensures transparency and strategic alignment with TAL’s broader objectives in promoting fair and progressive employment practices in Singapore.
Moving forward, these mitigation strategies will guide the development of response plans, recovery procedures, and continuity testing to validate TAL’s readiness. With these foundations in place, TAL is well-positioned to manage disruption effectively and maintain trust with its stakeholders during times of crisis.
More Information About Business Continuity Management Courses
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and the BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5].