Definition of a Full Crisis Management Simulation Exercise
A Full Crisis Management Simulation Exercise is a high-fidelity, immersive drill replicating a real-world crisis scenario to test an organisation’s end-to-end response capabilities under realistic pressure.
It involves cross-functional teams, external stakeholders, and real-time decision-making to evaluate preparedness, coordination, and recovery plans at scale.
![]() |
Pre-reading for Participants Attending Module 4 of the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer Course | ![]() |
Key Characteristics
-
Comprehensive Scope
-
Tests the entire crisis management framework, including:
-
Leadership decision-making (e.g., C-suite, crisis committee).
-
Operational response (e.g., IT, security, logistics).
-
Communication workflows (internal/external, including media/regulators).
-
Business continuity & recovery (post-crisis stabilisation).
-
-
-
High Realism
-
Simulates time-sensitive, multi-stage scenarios (e.g., escalating cyberattack + reputational fallout).
-
May include:
-
Physical deployments (e.g., emergency evacuations).
-
Live technology testing (e.g., failover systems, crisis comms tools).
-
External partners (e.g., law enforcement, PR agencies).
-
-
-
Dynamic Complexity
-
Uses branching scenarios where outcomes change based on team actions.
-
Introduces unplanned injects (e.g., "Breaking news: CEO resigns amid crisis").
-
-
Multi-Day Duration
-
Often runs for several hours to days (e.g., 8-hour war games or 72-hour continuity tests).
-
When to Conduct a Full Simulation
-
Regulatory compliance (e.g., financial sector stress tests).
-
After significant organisational changes (mergers, new leadership).
-
Preparing for high-risk events (e.g., Olympics, product launches).
-
Validating lessons learned from past incidents or partial drills.
Types of Full CM Simulations
Type | Focus | Example |
---|---|---|
Functional Exercise | Deep dive into one function (e.g., IT recovery) but with live actions | The IT team restores systems while PR handles media queries. |
Full-Scale Exercise | Multi-team, multi-agency realism | Simulated earthquake with EMS, government, and NGOs. |
War Game | Strategic decision-making under stress | Boardroom simulates a hostile takeover amid a cyberattack. |
Advantages vs. Partial Simulations
Full Simulation | Partial Simulation |
---|---|
Tests end-to-end integration | Focuses on isolated components |
Reveals systemic gaps (e.g., leadership bottlenecks) | Identifies team-specific weaknesses |
High cost & resource intensity | Low-cost, quick execution |
Example Scenario: Data Breach + Market Panic
Objective
Test the organisation’s ability to handle a ransomware attack while managing shareholder fallout.
Injects
-
Hour 1: IT detects encrypted files + ransom note.
-
Hour 3: Hackers leak data on dark web; media picks up the story.
-
Hour 6: Stock price drops 20%; regulators demand a response.
Teams Involved
- IT, Legal, PR, Leadership, Investor Relations.
Outcome Evaluation
-
Did the crisis team follow the playbook?
-
Were cross-functional handoffs seamless?
-
How did real-world constraints (time, misinformation) impact decisions?
Full simulations are the gold standard for stress-testing resilience.
More Information About Crisis Management Courses
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the CM-300 Crisis Management Implementer [CM-3] and the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer [CM-5].