.
Implementing Business Continuity Management for MINDS: Ensuring Continuity of Care and Services
BCM BB ARC_6

[BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment (RAR) is a New call-to-actioncritical component of Business Continuity Management (BCM) as it enables an organisation to systematically identify, analyse, and prioritise risks that may disrupt critical business functions.

For MINDS, whose mission focuses on providing lifelong support, care, education, and community inclusion for persons with intellectual disabilities, disruptions can have direct consequences on service users’ safety, wellbeing, regulatory compliance, and public trust.

This chapter applies the RAR methodology to assess key threats relevant to MINDS’ operating environment. Each threat is evaluated across multiple impact areas, including finance, operations, legal and regulatory obligations, reputation, social responsibility, people, and assets/IT systems.

The assessment considers both severity of impact and likelihood of occurrence, enabling MINDS to determine overall risk ratings, prioritise mitigation strategies, and strengthen organisational resilience.

Banner [BCM] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Moh Heng Goh
Business Continuity Management Certified Planner-Specialist-Expert

New call-to-action

 
Part 3: RAR - Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Banner [BCM] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

 

Introduction

[BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment (RAR) is a critical component of Business Continuity Management (BCM) as it enables an organisation to systematically identify, analyse, and prioritise risks that may disrupt critical business functions.

For MINDS, whose mission focuses on providing lifelong support, care, education, and community inclusion for persons with intellectual disabilities, disruptions can have direct consequences on service users’ safety, wellbeing, regulatory compliance, and public trust.

This chapter applies the RAR methodology to assess key threats relevant to MINDS’ operating environment. Each threat is evaluated across multiple impact areas, including finance, operations, legal and regulatory obligations, reputation, social responsibility, people, and assets/IT systems.

The assessment considers both severity of impact and likelihood of occurrence, enabling MINDS to determine overall risk ratings, prioritise mitigation strategies, and strengthen organisational resilience.

New call-to-action

Table R3: Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Threat

Impact Area - Finance

Impact Area - Operations

Impact Area - Legal & Regulatory

Impact Area - Reputation & Image

Impact Area - Social Responsibility

Impact Area - People

Impact Area - Assets/ IT Systems/ Information

Risk Impact Area (Highest Numeric Score)

Risk Likelihood

Risk Rating

Risk Level

Expected Period of Disruption

Pandemic / Infectious Disease Outbreak

Increased medical, staffing, and contingency costs

Severe disruption to residential, day care, and training services

High (MOH / MSF safe management compliance)

High

Very High – vulnerable service users affected

Very High – staff and residents’ health risk

Moderate (remote systems strain)

People

Likely

Very High

Extreme

Weeks to months

Prolonged Power Outage

Moderate financial loss due to generators and repairs

Disruption to care routines and facilities

Moderate (safety obligations)

Moderate

High – essential care services interrupted

High – safety and wellbeing risks

High – IT and medical equipment affected

Operations

Possible

High

High

Hours to days

Cyberattack / Data Breach

High remediation and potential penalties

Disruption to administrative and care systems

High (PDPA non-compliance)

High

Moderate

Moderate – staff workload stress

Very High – sensitive client data compromised

Assets / IT Systems

Possible

High

High

Days to weeks

Manpower Shortage / Industrial Action

Increased overtime and agency staff costs

Inability to maintain service levels

Moderate (service delivery obligations)

Moderate

High – care continuity affected

Very High – staff burnout

Low

People

Likely

High

High

Days to weeks

Fire at Residential or Training Facility

High repair and relocation costs

Immediate shutdown of affected facility

High (fire safety regulations)

High

Very High – client safety and welfare

Very High – injury or loss of life risk

High – damage to facilities and systems

People

Unlikely

Very High

High

Days to months

Flooding / Water Damage

Moderate repair and replacement costs

Disruption to centres at ground level

Moderate

Moderate

High – service interruption

Moderate

High – equipment damage

Assets

Possible

Medium

Medium

Days

Loss of Critical Third-Party Service Provider (e.g. transport, catering)

Moderate replacement costs

Disruption to daily routines

Low

Moderate

High – affects service users’ daily needs

Moderate

Low

Operations

Possible

Medium

Medium

Days

Regulatory Breach / Non-Compliance

High fines and corrective costs

Disruption due to investigations

Very High

High

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Legal & Regulatory

Unlikely

High

High

Weeks

IT System Failure (Core Care / HR / Finance Systems)

Moderate financial impact

High operational inefficiency

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Very High – system downtime

Assets / IT Systems

Possible

High

High

Hours to days

Reputational Crisis (Negative Media Coverage)

Loss of donations and funding risk

Indirect operational impact

Moderate

Very High

High – public trust erosion

Moderate

Low

Reputation & Image

Possible

High

High

Weeks to months

 
 
 

New call-to-action

The Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment highlights that people-centric risks, particularly those affecting service users, caregivers, and frontline staff, pose the greatest potential impact to MINDS.

Threats such as pandemics, manpower shortages, facility incidents, and cyber threats carry high to extreme risk levels due to their ability to disrupt essential care services and compromise client safety, data protection, and regulatory compliance.

By understanding the highest-impact areas and expected periods of disruption, MINDS can prioritise risk treatment strategies such as workforce resilience planning, infection control measures, IT system redundancy, third-party contingency arrangements, and crisis communications planning.

This structured RAR forms a vital input into subsequent BCM activities, including risk mitigation, Business Impact Analysis (BIA) alignment, and recovery strategy development, ensuring MINDS remains resilient while continuing to fulfil its social mission.

 

Implementing Business Continuity Management for MINDS:
Ensuring Continuity of Care and Services
eBook 3: Starting Your BCM Implementation
MBCO P&S RAR T1 RAR T2 RAR T3 BCS T1  CBF
[BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [BIA] MBCO Corporate MBCO [BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [BIA] [PS] Key Product and Services [BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [RAR] [T1] List of Threats [BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [RAR] [T2] Treatment and Control [BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment BCM] [MINDS] [E3] [BCS] [T1] Mitigation Strategies and Justification [BCM] [MINDS] [E1] [C10] Identifying Critical Business Functions
 

 


More Information About Business Continuity Management Courses

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the  BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and the BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5].

New call-to-action  New call-to-action Register [BL-B-3]*
New call-to-action New call-to-action New call-to-action
FAQ [BL-B-3]

Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions.

Email to Sales Team [BCM Institute]

 FAQ BL-B-5 BCM-5000
New call-to-action New call-to-action New call-to-action
 
 

Your Comments Here :

 

More Posts

New Call-to-action