.

Implementing Business Continuity Management for the Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRA): A Practical Guide to Organisational Resilience, Service Continuity, and Regulatory Excellence
BCM BB ARC_6

[BCM] [GRA] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

[Full Banner] Gambling Regulatory Authority

This chapter forms part of the Risk Analysis and Review (RAR) phase within the eBook "Implementing Business Continuity Management for the Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRA): A Practical Guide to Organisational Resilience, Service Continuity, and Regulatory Excellence."

Following the identification of threats and the establishment of risk treatment measures, the next step is to assess the likelihood and potential impact of each threat.

The objective of risk analysis is to determine which threats pose the greatest risk to GRA's ability to perform its regulatory responsibilities and to prioritise resources accordingly.

Banner [BCM] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Moh Heng Goh
Business Continuity Management Certified Planner-Specialist-Expert

[BCM] [GRA] Legal Disclaimer Banner

 
Part 3: RAR - Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Banner [BCM] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

 

Introduction

[BCM] [GRA] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

This chapter forms part of the Risk Analysis and Review (RAR) phase within the eBook "Implementing Business Continuity Management for the Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRA): A Practical Guide to Organisational Resilience, Service Continuity, and Regulatory Excellence."

Following the identification of threats and the establishment of risk treatment measures, the next step is to assess the likelihood and potential impact of each threat.

The objective of risk analysis is to determine which threats pose the greatest risk to GRA's ability to perform its regulatory responsibilities and to prioritise resources accordingly.

For the purpose of this assessment, a five-point scale is used:

Score

Impact / Likelihood Description

1

Very Low

2

Low

3

Moderate

4

High

5

Very High

Risk Rating = Highest Impact Score × Likelihood Score

Risk Levels are defined as:

Risk Rating

Risk Level

1 – 5

Low

6 – 10

Moderate

11 – 15

High

16 – 25

Extreme

The assessment below reflects the operational environment, regulatory responsibilities, technology dependencies, and stakeholder expectations of GRA.

New call-to-action

Table T3: Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment

Threat

Finance

Operations

Legal & Regulatory

Reputation & Image

Social Responsibility

People

Assets / IT Systems / Information

Highest Impact Score

Likelihood

Risk Rating

Risk Level

Expected Period of Disruption

Flood

2

4

2

3

2

3

3

4

2

8

Moderate

1–5 Days

Pandemic / Infectious Disease Outbreak

3

5

4

4

5

5

2

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Weeks to Months

Severe Haze Incident

2

3

1

2

3

3

1

3

3

9

Moderate

Several Days

Extreme Weather Event

2

3

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

9

Moderate

1–3 Days

Fire

4

5

3

4

3

4

5

5

2

10

Moderate

Several Days to Weeks

Terrorist Incident

4

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

2

10

Moderate

Several Days to Weeks

Civil Disturbance

2

3

2

3

3

3

1

3

2

6

Moderate

1–3 Days

Building Structural Failure

4

4

2

3

2

3

3

4

2

8

Moderate

Several Weeks

Hazardous Material Incident

3

4

3

3

4

4

2

4

2

8

Moderate

Several Days

Loss of Key Personnel

2

4

4

3

2

5

1

5

3

15

High

Several Weeks

Travel Restrictions

2

3

2

2

2

3

1

3

3

9

Moderate

Several Days to Weeks

Mass Casualty Incident

3

5

4

4

5

5

2

5

2

10

Moderate

Several Weeks

Telecommunications Provider Failure

3

5

4

4

3

3

5

5

3

15

High

Several Hours to Days

Cloud Service Provider Outage

3

5

4

4

2

2

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Hours to Days

Power Supply Failure

3

5

3

3

2

2

5

5

3

15

High

Several Hours to Days

Vendor Failure

3

4

3

3

2

2

4

4

3

12

High

Several Days

Data Centre Outage

4

5

4

4

2

2

5

5

3

15

High

Several Hours to Days

Cyberattack / Ransomware

4

5

5

5

4

3

5

5

5

25

Extreme

Several Days to Weeks

Data Breach

4

4

5

5

4

2

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Days to Weeks

Network Failure

2

5

3

3

2

2

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Hours

Hardware Failure

2

4

2

2

1

1

5

5

3

15

High

Several Hours to Days

Software Failure

2

4

3

3

1

1

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Hours to Days

Database Corruption

3

5

4

4

2

1

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Hours to Days

Insider Threat

4

4

5

5

4

3

5

5

3

15

High

Several Days to Weeks

AI-Enabled Threats

4

4

5

5

4

2

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Days

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack

3

5

4

4

2

1

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Hours to Days

Failure of Regulatory Information Systems

4

5

5

5

4

2

5

5

4

20

Extreme

Several Hours to Days

 

Highest Risk Threats for GRA

The following threats are assessed as Extreme Risks and should receive priority management attention:

Threat

Risk Rating

Risk Level

Cyberattack / Ransomware

25

Extreme

Pandemic / Infectious Disease Outbreak

20

Extreme

Cloud Service Provider Outage

20

Extreme

Data Breach

20

Extreme

Network Failure

20

Extreme

Software Failure

20

Extreme

Database Corruption

20

Extreme

AI-Enabled Threats

20

Extreme

DDoS Attack

20

Extreme

Failure of Regulatory Information Systems

20

Extreme

These threats have the greatest potential to disrupt GRA's critical regulatory functions and therefore require enhanced controls, continuity strategies, and recovery planning.

Key Risk Analysis Observations

Technology and Information Risks Dominate

The assessment indicates that the highest risks arise from:

  • Cybersecurity incidents.
  • Regulatory system outages.
  • Data integrity failures.
  • Cloud and telecommunications dependencies.
Regulatory Impact is Significant

Any prolonged disruption affecting:

  • Licensing functions.
  • Regulatory monitoring.
  • Enforcement operations.
  • Regulatory intelligence activities.

may result in significant regulatory and reputational consequences.

Third-Party Dependencies Increase Exposure

Reliance on:

  • Telecommunications providers.
  • Cloud service providers.
  • Data centre operators.
  • Technology vendors.

creates additional operational resilience challenges that must be managed proactively.

Workforce Resilience Remains Important

Although technology risks dominate, workforce-related threats, such as pandemics and the loss of key personnel, continue to pose significant operational challenges.

New call-to-action

Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment provides a structured approach for evaluating threats affecting the Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRA) and prioritising risk treatment activities. By assessing the impact of each threat across financial, operational, legal, reputational, social responsibility, people, and information asset dimensions, GRA can identify those risks that pose the greatest threat to its ability to fulfil its regulatory mandate.

The results of this assessment highlight the increasing importance of cybersecurity, technology resilience, data protection, third-party risk management, and workforce preparedness. These findings provide valuable input into the subsequent Business Continuity Management phases, particularly Business Impact Analysis, Business Continuity Strategy development, and recovery planning. Through regular review and reassessment of risks, GRA can maintain an up-to-date understanding of its threat landscape and strengthen its overall organisational resilience in alignment with ISO 22301 and regulatory best practices.

 

[Thin Banner] Gambling Regulatory Authority

eBook 3: Starting Your BCM Implementation
MBCO P&S RAR T1 RAR T2 RAR T3 BCS T1  CBF
BCM] [GRA] [E3] [BIA] MBCO Corporate MBCO BCM] [GRA] [E3] [BIA] [PS] Key Product and Services BCM] [GRA] [E3] [RAR] [T1] List of Threats [BCM] [GRA] [E3] [RAR] [T2] Treatment and Control [BCM] [GRA] [E3] [RAR] [T3] Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment BCM] [GRA] [E3] [BCS] [T1] Mitigation Strategies and Justification [BCM] [GRA] [E1] [C10] Identifying Critical Business Functions
 

 


More Information About Business Continuity Management Courses

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the  BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and the BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5].

New call-to-action  New call-to-action Register [BL-B-3]*
New call-to-action New call-to-action New call-to-action
FAQ [BL-B-3]

Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions.

Email to Sales Team [BCM Institute]

 FAQ BL-B-5 BCM-5000
New call-to-action New call-to-action New call-to-action
 
 

Your Comments Here :

 

More Posts

New Call-to-action