. .

Understanding Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) in Operational Resilience
BB OR [D] 6

[OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C4] TPRM Governance and Operating Model

An effective Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) framework cannot function without strong governance and a clearly defined operating model. As third-party dependencies grow in scale and criticality, organisations must ensure that accountability, oversight, and decision-making are well structured across all levels.

Regulators such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) emphasise that financial institutions remain fully accountable for risks arising from outsourcing and third-party arrangements.

This requires a governance model that integrates TPRM into enterprise risk management, Operational Resilience, and business operations.

This chapter outlines how to establish a robust TPRM governance structure, including roles and responsibilities (RACI), the Three Lines of Defence model, and an organisational operating model.

 

New call-to-action

Moh Heng Goh
Operational Resilience Certified Planner-Specialist-Expert

New call-to-action

eBook 4: Chapter 4

TPRM Governance and Operating Model

New call-to-action

Introduction

An effective Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) framework cannot function without strong governance and a clearly defined operating model. As third-party dependencies grow in scale and criticality, organisations must ensure that accountability, oversight, and decision-making are well structured across all levels.

Regulators such as the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) emphasise that financial institutions remain fully accountable for risks arising from outsourcing and third-party arrangements. 

This requires a governance model that integrates TPRM into enterprise risk management, Operational Resilience, and business operations.

This chapter outlines how to establish a robust TPRM governance structure, including roles and responsibilities (RACI), the Three Lines of Defence model, and an organisational operating model.

 

 

Purpose of This Chapter

This chapter provides a structured approach to designing and implementing TPRM governance. By the end of this chapter, readers will:

  • Understand governance principles for TPRM
  • Apply the Three Lines of Defence (3LoD) model
  • Define roles using a RACI framework
  • Design an effective TPRM organisational structure
  • Align governance with Operational Resilience and regulatory expectations

 

Governance Principles for TPRM

A strong TPRM governance model should be built on the following principles:

1. Accountability

The organisation retains full accountability for third-party risks—even when services are outsourced.

2. Risk Ownership

Business units owning third-party relationships must also own the associated risks.

3. Independent Oversight

Risk and compliance functions must provide independent challenge and review.

4. End-to-End Visibility

Governance must cover the entire third-party lifecycle and supply chain (including fourth parties).

5. Integration with Operational Resilience

TPRM must be embedded into:

  • Critical Business Services (CBS)
  • Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
  • Scenario Testing
  • Crisis Management

The Three Lines of Defence (3LoD) Model

The Three Lines of Defence model provides a clear structure for managing and overseeing third-party risks.

Table: TPRM Roles under the Three Lines of Defence

 

Line of Defence

Function

Key Responsibilities in TPRM

Examples

First Line (Business / Operations)

Business Units, Procurement, Vendor Owners

Identify, assess, and manage third-party risks; ensure vendor performance; maintain relationships

Vendor Manager, Procurement Team

Second Line (Risk & Compliance)

Risk Management, Compliance, Information Security

Develop TPRM framework, policies, and risk standards; perform independent risk assessments; monitor compliance

Operational Risk, IT Risk, Compliance

Third Line (Internal Audit)

Internal Audit

Provide independent assurance on the effectiveness of TPRM framework and controls

Internal Audit Function

👉 Key Insight:

  • First Line = Own the risk
  • Second Line = Oversee and challenge the risk
  • Third Line = Assure the risk management process

 

RACI Matrix for TPRM

A RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix ensures clarity of roles across the TPRM lifecycle.

Template: TPRM RACI Matrix

 

TPRM Activity

Business Unit

Procurement

Risk Management

Compliance

IT/Security

Internal Audit

Senior Management

Vendor Identification

R

A

C

I

I

I

I

Due Diligence

R

A

C

C

C

I

I

Risk Assessment

R

C

A

C

C

I

I

Contracting

R

A

C

C

C

I

I

Ongoing Monitoring

R

C

A

C

C

I

I

Incident Management

R

C

A

C

A

I

I

Exit Management

R

A

C

C

C

I

I

Audit & Assurance

I

I

C

C

C

A

I

Legend:

  • R = Responsible (executes task)
  • A = Accountable (ultimate ownership)
  • C = Consulted (provides input)
  • I = Informed (kept updated)

 

TPRM Organisational Structure

Recommended Operating Model

A centralised or hybrid model is typically most effective for banks.

Table: TPRM Organisational Structure

 

Role

Function

Key Responsibilities

Board of Directors

Oversight

Approve risk appetite, review TPRM framework

Senior Management

Governance

Ensure implementation of the TPRM strategy

TPRM Function (Central Team)

Coordination

Develop a framework, maintain vendor inventory, and report

Business Units

Execution

Manage vendors, perform risk assessments

Procurement

Sourcing

Vendor selection, contract negotiation

Risk & Compliance

Oversight

Policy setting, risk monitoring, regulatory alignment

IT & Cybersecurity

Technical Risk

Assess technology and cyber risks

Internal Audit

Assurance

Audit TPRM effectiveness

 

TPRM Governance Committees

Example: TPRM Governance Committee Structure

 

Committee

Purpose

Members

Frequency

Board Risk Committee

Strategic oversight of third-party risk

Board members, CRO

Quarterly

Operational Risk Committee

Monitor TPRM risks and issues

Risk, Compliance, Business Heads

Monthly

Vendor Risk Committee

Review high-risk vendors

TPRM team, IT, Procurement

Monthly

Crisis Management Team

Handle major disruptions

Senior Management, BCM Team

As needed

 

Policy and Standards Framework

Key TPRM Policies

 

Policy

Description

TPRM Policy

Defines overall governance and framework

Outsourcing Policy

Covers regulatory requirements

Information Security Policy

Defines cyber risk expectations

Business Continuity Policy

Ensures vendor resilience capability

Vendor Risk Assessment Standard

Defines risk scoring methodology

 

Integration with Operational Resilience

Table: Governance Alignment with OR Components

 

OR Component

Governance Requirement

Critical Business Services (CBS)

Assign ownership of the vendor-supported CBS

Business Impact Analysis (BIA)

Ensure third-party dependencies are assessed

Impact Tolerance

Define governance for breach escalation

Scenario Testing

Include governance roles in simulations

Crisis Management

Define escalation and decision-making authority

 

Escalation and Reporting Framework

Template: TPRM Risk Escalation Matrix

 

Risk Level

Description

Escalation Level

Reporting Frequency

Action Required

Low

Minimal impact

Business Unit

Quarterly

Monitor

Medium

Moderate impact

Risk Committee

Monthly

Mitigation plan

High

Significant CBS impact

Senior Management

Immediate

Immediate action

Critical

Severe disruption

Board

Immediate

Crisis response

 

Key Success Factors

  • Clear ownership and accountability across all lines
  • Strong central coordination (TPRM function)
  • Effective cross-functional collaboration
  • Integration with Operational Resilience and BCM
  • Continuous training and awareness

Key Takeaways

  • Governance is the foundation of effective TPRM
  • The Three Lines of Defence ensure proper oversight
  • A RACI model eliminates ambiguity in responsibilities
  • A structured organisational model enables execution at scale
  • Strong governance ensures compliance with BSP 1203 and BNM expectations

 

New call-to-action

 

A well-defined governance and operating model is essential to ensure that Third-Party Risk Management is consistently applied, effectively monitored, and fully aligned with organisational objectives.

By establishing clear roles, responsibilities, and oversight mechanisms, financial institutions can manage third-party risks with confidence and accountability.

Embedding TPRM within the Three Lines of Defence, supported by a robust RACI framework and organisational structure, ensures that risks are not only identified but actively managed throughout the lifecycle.

When integrated with Operational Resilience, this governance model enables organisations to maintain the continuity of critical services—even in the face of third-party disruptions.

 

[Pillar] [3_4] [Banner] [C4] Third-Party Risk Management

C1 C2 C3 C4
[OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C1] Introduction to TPRM [OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C2] Types of Third-Party Risks [OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C3] Framework and Lifecycle [OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C4] Governance and Operating Model
C5 C6 C7 C8
[OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C5] Tools, Templates and Scoring Models [OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C6] Scenario Testing for Third-Party Failures [OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C7] Regulatory Compliance Checklist [OR] [Pillar] [E4] [C8] Case Study_ Implementation in Banking

 

More Information About OR-5000 [OR-5] or OR-300 [OR-3]

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.

BL-OR-3 Register Now BL-OR-3_Tell Me More BL-OR-3_View Schedule
BL-OR-5_Register Now BL-OR-5_Tell Me More  [BL-OR] [3-4-5] View Schedule
[BL-OR] [3] FAQ OR-300

If you have any questions, click to contact us.Email to Sales Team [BCM Institute]

FAQ BL-OR-5 OR-5000
OR Implementer Landing Page

New call-to-action

New call-to-action

 

Comments:

 

CTA Banner_OR

CTA Banner_ORA

CTA Banner_BCM

CTA Banner_ITDR

CTA Banner_CM