[P2] [S2] Additional Explanation
Understanding Interconnections and Interdependencies in Operational Resilience
Introduction
Operational resilience requires organisations to move beyond siloed views of risk and operations and adopt a system-wide perspective on service delivery.
Central to this perspective is the concept of mapping interconnections and interdependencies, a key activity within Operational Resilience Phase 2 – Implement (P2-S2) of the BCM Institute methodology.
This chapter defines interconnections and interdependencies, clarifies their distinctions, and explains their significance in enabling organisations to identify vulnerabilities, manage disruption, and remain within defined impact tolerances.
Purpose of the Chapter
The purpose of this chapter is to:
- Define interconnections and interdependencies in the context of operational resilience
- Explain how these concepts apply to Critical Business Services (CBS)
- Highlight the differences and relationships between the two terms
- Provide practical insight into their role in resilience planning and scenario testing
Definition of Interconnections
What are Interconnections?
Interconnections are the linkages, relationships, and points of interaction among different components within an organisation’s operating environment.
These components typically include:
- Processes (workflows and activities)
- People (staff, teams, roles)
- Technology (applications, systems, infrastructure)
- Facilities (physical locations, data centres)
- Third parties (vendors, service providers)
Key Characteristics of Interconnections
- Represent how components are connected
- Focus on flows and interactions (e.g., data flow, process handoffs)
- Can be internal or external
- Often visualised through process maps, system diagrams, or network maps
Example
A payment processing system connected to a core banking platform is an interconnection. The link enables transaction data to flow between systems.
Definition of Interdependencies
What are Interdependencies?
Interdependencies refer to the mutual reliance between components, in which the functioning of one component depends on the availability or performance of another.
Key Characteristics of Interdependencies
- Represent dependency relationships
- Focus on impact and reliance
- Highlight potential points of failure
- Can be unidirectional or bidirectional
- Critical for identifying cascading risks
Example
If the payment processing system cannot function without the core banking platform, it is dependent on that platform—an interdependency.
Interconnections vs Interdependencies
While often used together, these terms are not interchangeable. Understanding their distinction is essential for accurate mapping and analysis.
|
Aspect |
Interconnections |
Interdependencies |
|
Definition |
Linkages or connections between components |
Dependency relationships between components |
|
Focus |
Structure and connectivity |
Reliance and impact |
|
Nature |
Describes how things are connected |
Describes how things depend on each other |
|
Risk Perspective |
Identifies pathways of interaction |
Identifies points of failure and vulnerability |
|
Directionality |
May or may not imply dependency |
Always implies dependency (one affects another) |
|
Example |
System A sends data to System B |
System B cannot operate without System A |
|
Usage in Mapping |
Forms the network map |
Enables risk and impact analysis |
Relationship Between Interconnections and Interdependencies
Interconnections and interdependencies are complementary concepts:
- Interconnections form the structure of the operating environment
- Interdependencies reveal the criticality within that structure
Key Insight
Not all interconnections represent interdependencies, but all interdependencies arise from interconnections.
This distinction is crucial:
- A connection may exist without critical reliance
- But a dependency always implies a connection that matters for service delivery
Application in Operational Resilience
Supporting Critical Business Services (CBS)
Mapping interconnections and interdependencies enables organisations to:
- Identify end-to-end service delivery chains
- Understand how CBS are supported by underlying resources
- Detect hidden dependencies, especially across third parties
Enabling Impact Tolerance Setting
Understanding dependencies helps organisations determine:
- Maximum tolerable downtime (MTD)
- Maximum tolerable data loss (MTDL)
- Points where disruption becomes intolerable
Without identifying interdependencies, impact tolerance setting becomes incomplete and unreliable.
Strengthening Scenario Testing
Scenario testing relies heavily on these concepts:
- Interconnections define the scope of testing
- Interdependencies determine where failures propagate
Example:
A cyberattack on a third-party vendor may cascade through interconnected systems due to underlying interdependencies.
Enhancing Risk Identification
Interdependency mapping allows organisations to:
- Identify single points of failure
- Detect concentration risks (e.g., reliance on a single vendor)
- Understand systemic and cascading failures
Practical Mapping Considerations
When mapping interconnections and interdependencies, organisations should:
Adopt a Structured Approach
- Start with Critical Business Services (CBS)
- Decompose into sub-CBS and processes
- Map supporting resources (People, Process, Technology, Third Parties)
Capture Both Dimensions
- Document connections (who/what is linked)
- Identify dependencies (what relies on what)
Use Standardised Data Fields
Typical mapping fields include:
- Component Type (Process, System, Vendor)
- Connection Type (data flow, control flow)
- Dependency Type (critical, non-critical)
- Upstream/Downstream relationships
Common Challenges
Organisations often face the following issues:
- Confusing connections with dependencies
- Incomplete mapping of third-party relationships
- Lack of granularity in process decomposition
- Static mapping that does not reflect real-time changes
Addressing these challenges requires governance, continuous updates, and integration with operational risk and BCM frameworks.
Interconnections and interdependencies form the foundation of operational resilience mapping.
While interconnections describe the structure of relationships, interdependencies reveal the critical reliance and risk embedded within those relationships.
A mature operational resilience capability requires organisations to:
-
Clearly distinguish between these two concepts
-
Map both comprehensively across Critical Business Services
-
Use the insights to inform impact tolerance setting, scenario testing, and risk management
Ultimately, understanding interconnections and interdependencies transforms mapping from a documentation exercise into a powerful decision-making tool, enabling organisations to anticipate disruptions, manage cascading failures, and sustain critical services under stress.

![BB OR [D] 6 BB OR [D] 6](https://blog.bcm-institute.org/hs-fs/hubfs/BB%20OR%20%5BAi%20Gen%20Blog%20Photo%5D/OR%20Pictures%20A/BB%20OR%20Folder%20D/BB%20OR%20%5BD%5D%206.jpg?width=2000&height=1333&name=BB%20OR%20%5BD%5D%206.jpg)









![[BL-OR] [3-4-5] View Schedule](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/3893111/d0d733a1-16c0-4b68-a26d-adbfd4fc6069.png)
![[BL-OR] [3] FAQ OR-300](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/3893111/f20c71b4-f5e8-4aa5-8056-c374ca33a091.png)
![Email to Sales Team [BCM Institute]](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/3893111/3c53daeb-2836-4843-b0e0-645baee2ab9e.png)









