Chapter 8
Competency Requirements
Introduction: From Strategy to Execution
Operational resilience (OR) becomes meaningful only when translated
into structured, time-bound execution.
While regulatory expectations influenced by institutions such as the Bank for International Settlements provide high-level direction, financial institutions must operationalise these expectations through a realistic roadmap.
A 12–18 month implementation horizon is practical for most mid-sized to large institutions.
It allows for structured design, stakeholder engagement, pilot testing, refinement, and institutionalisation—without overwhelming the organisation.
This chapter presents a phased roadmap designed to balance ambition with sustainability.
Guiding Principles for Implementation
Before detailing the phases, institutions should anchor implementation on the following principles:
- Phased Deployment – Avoid enterprise-wide complexity at the outset.
- Executive Sponsorship – Secure visible and sustained leadership backing.
- Pilot and Prove – Demonstrate early wins to build credibility.
- Data Discipline – Ensure integrity in mapping and reporting.
- Continuous Improvement – Treat resilience as an evolving capability.
Phase 1 (Months 1–3): Foundation and Governance Setup
Objectives:
- Establish mandate
- Secure executive sponsorship
- Design governance architecture
- Define scope
Key Activities:
- Finalise Operational Resilience Charter
- Confirm reporting line (e.g., CRO or COO)
- Establish OR Committee and Working Group
- Approve Terms of Reference
- Define criteria for identifying Critical Business Services (CBS)
- Develop high-level implementation plan
Deliverables:
- Board-approved OR mandate
- Governance structure diagram
- CBS identification criteria
- Initial resource allocation
Success Indicator:
Formal institutional recognition of OR with executive sponsorship secured.
Phase 2 (Months 4–6): Identification of Critical Business
Services
Objectives:
- Identify and validate CBS
- Assign service ownership
- Begin initial mapping
Key Activities:
- Conduct workshops with business units
- Apply CBS criticality criteria
- Validate services against customer, financial, and regulatory impact
- Obtain OR Committee endorsement
- Present CBS list to Board for approval
Deliverables:
- Approved CBS inventory
- Assigned CBS owners
- Preliminary service documentation
Success Indicator:
Clear institutional consensus on priority services.
Phase 3 (Months 7–9): End-to-End Service Mapping and Dependency Analysis
Objectives:
- Map CBS comprehensively
- Identify systemic vulnerabilities
Key Activities:
- Conduct cross-functional mapping workshops
- Document dependencies across:
- People
- Processes
- Technology
- Facilities
- Third parties
- Validate mapping accuracy
- Identify concentration risks
Deliverables:
- Documented end-to-end service maps
- Dependency inventory
- Vulnerability register
Success Indicator:
Full visibility of CBS dependencies and risk exposure.
Phase 4 (Months 10–12): Impact Tolerance Design and Scenario Testing
Objectives:
- Define measurable impact tolerances
- Validate resilience capability through stress testing
Key Activities:
- Develop quantitative and qualitative tolerance thresholds
- Facilitate cross-functional discussions to refine tolerances
- Obtain OR Committee endorsement
- Secure Board approval of tolerances
- Design severe but plausible scenarios
- Conduct pilot scenario testing for selected CBS
- Document findings and remediation actions
Deliverables:
- Approved impact tolerances
- Scenario test reports
- Identified remediation actions
Success Indicator:
Validated understanding of disruption limits and exposure gaps.
Phase 5 (Months 13–15): Remediation and Integration
Objectives:
- Address vulnerabilities
- Integrate OR into business processes
Key Activities:
- Prioritise remediation based on risk severity
- Assign accountability for closure
- Integrate OR into:
- New product approval
- Outsourcing governance
- Technology change management
- Risk reporting cycles
- Develop resilience dashboards
Deliverables:
- Remediation tracking framework
- Integrated governance reporting
- OR dashboard for senior management
Success Indicator:
Resilience gaps actively managed and embedded into operational governance.
Phase 6 (Months 16–18): Institutionalisation and Maturity Enhancement
Objectives:
- Strengthen sustainability
- Expand scenario testing
- Enhance reporting sophistication
Key Activities:
- Conduct additional scenario testing across remaining CBS
- Refine impact tolerances based on testing outcomes
- Conduct post-incident reviews (if applicable)
- Develop annual OR cycle
- Prepare for regulatory review or thematic inspection
- Benchmark against peer practices
Deliverables:
- Annual OR Plan
- Enhanced management reporting pack
- Evidence of continuous improvement
- Internal Audit review readiness
Success Indicator:
Operational resilience embedded as a recurring governance discipline.
Roadmap Summary Timeline
|
Phase |
Months |
Focus Area |
|
Phase 1 |
1–3 |
Mandate & Governance |
|
Phase 2 |
4–6 |
CBS Identification |
|
Phase 3 |
7–9 |
Service Mapping |
|
Phase 4 |
10–12 |
Impact Tolerances & Testing |
|
Phase 5 |
13–15 |
Remediation & Integration |
|
Phase 6 |
16–18 |
Institutionalisation |
Common Roadmap Risks
Even with structured planning, institutions may encounter:
- Delays in CBS agreement
- Insufficient data quality
- Executive attention drift
- Resource reallocation to urgent projects
- Testing fatigue
- Slow remediation closure
Mitigation strategies include:
- Monthly milestone tracking
- Clear accountability assignments
- Regular executive updates
- Prioritisation discipline
Indicators of Successful 18-Month Implementation
By the end of 18 months, a mature institution should demonstrate:
- Board-approved CBS and impact tolerances
- Complete end-to-end service maps
- Regular severe scenario testing
- Active remediation tracking
- Integrated OR reporting
- Defined annual resilience cycle
- Clear executive accountability
Operational resilience should no longer feel like a project—it should operate as a governance capability.
A structured 12–18 month roadmap enables financial institutions to transition from conceptual design to embedded operational resilience.
The journey involves:
- Governance commitment
- Cross-functional collaboration
- Analytical rigour
- Cultural alignment
- Continuous improvement
Operational resilience is not achieved through speed, but through disciplined execution.
Key Insight:
A well-planned roadmap transforms operational resilience from a regulatory expectation into a sustainable institutional capability—protecting critical business services and strengthening long-term organisational stability.
Building Operational Resilience in Financial Institutions: A Practical Guide to Governance, Team Structure and Sustainable Implementation |
|||
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

Gain Competency: For organisations looking to accelerate their journey, BCM Institute’s training and certification programs, including the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course, provide in-depth insights and practical toolkits for effectively embedding this model.
More Information About Operational Resilience Course OR-5000 [OR-5] or OR-300 [OR-3]
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer [OR-3] course and the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer [OR-5] course.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |


















![[BL-OR] [3-4-5] View Schedule](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/3893111/d0d733a1-16c0-4b68-a26d-adbfd4fc6069.png)
![[BL-OR] [3] FAQ OR-300](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/3893111/f20c71b4-f5e8-4aa5-8056-c374ca33a091.png)
![Email to Sales Team [BCM Institute]](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/3893111/3c53daeb-2836-4843-b0e0-645baee2ab9e.png)








