[BCM] [KL] [E2] [C3] Risk Analysis and Review

eBook 2: Chapter 3

Risk Analysis and Review Phase of the BCM Planning Methodology for Kinderland

Introduction

The "Risk Analysis and Review" (RAR) phase is a critical part of the Business Continuity Management (BCM) planning methodology, particularly under the ISO22301 standard.

For Kinderland, as a leading preschool education provider, this phase helps identify, assess, and mitigate the risks that could disrupt its educational services and operations.

By recognising and managing these risks effectively, Kinderland ensures that it can continue to provide a safe and stable environment for children and staff, even in the face of unforeseen events.

In this chapter, we will outline the steps involved in the Risk Analysis and Review phase, emphasizing how they apply to Kinderland’s operations.

1. Identifying Risks

The first step in the Risk Analysis and Review phase is identifying potential threats that could disrupt operations.

For Kinderland, these risks could stem from both internal and external sources.

These threats could impact the safety of children, the well-being of staff, or the continuity of educational services. Common risks that may arise include:

Health and Safety Risks: The possibility of infectious disease outbreaks, such as flu or COVID-19, which can affect the health of children, staff, and parents.
Natural Disasters: Earthquakes, floods, or other weather-related events that could damage infrastructure or disrupt operations.
Cybersecurity Threats: Data breaches or hacking incidents that could compromise sensitive information, including student records or financial data.
Supply Chain Disruptions: Delays in receiving educational materials or supplies, particularly in the case of unexpected shortages or supplier issues.
Regulatory and Compliance Risks: Changes in government regulations or new education policies that may require adjustments to existing practices.
Technological Failures: System outages affecting Kinderland’s online platforms or electronic learning tools, which are increasingly part of the educational delivery process.

Example:

Consider the outbreak of a contagious virus at one of the Kinderland locations.

The risk identified would be the potential disruption to normal classes, affecting both the staff's ability to provide services and parents' confidence in sending their children to school.

2. Assessing Risks

Once risks are identified, the next step is assessing the likelihood and impact of each risk.

This is a critical step to prioritise actions based on the severity and probability of each risk. The assessment typically involves both qualitative and quantitative evaluations.

Likelihood: The probability of the risk occurring (e.g., how likely is it that a particular natural disaster will affect Kinderland’s operations in a given year).
Impact: The potential consequences of the risk, should it occur (e.g., how disruptive an outbreak of illness would be to Kinderland’s ability to operate).

Risk Assessment Matrix:

A typical approach to assessing risks is using a risk assessment matrix, which categorizes risks into different levels of severity:

High Impact, High Likelihood: Immediate action required (e.g., cyber-attacks or health outbreaks).
High Impact, Low Likelihood: Develop mitigation strategies (e.g., major natural disasters).
Low Impact, High Likelihood: Implement controls to reduce impact (e.g., minor technical failures).
Low Impact, Low Likelihood: Monitor, but no immediate action required (e.g., regulatory changes with minimal impact).

Example:

For Kinderland, an outbreak of a contagious virus may fall into the "High Impact, High Likelihood" category, requiring immediate action such as enhanced hygiene practices, isolation measures, and remote learning setups.

3. Mitigating Risks

Mitigating risks involves implementing measures to reduce the identified risks to an acceptable level.

This is where the development of contingency plans, resource allocation, and preventive strategies comes into play.

For each risk identified, Kinderland needs to implement a tailored mitigation strategy, which may include:

Health and Safety Protocols: For infectious diseases, this could involve installing hand sanitisers, establishing isolation areas, requiring staff and children to wear masks, and limiting the number of children in each classroom to ensure social distancing.
Disaster Preparedness Plans: For natural disasters, this could include ensuring that all Kinderland facilities are equipped with emergency supplies (e.g., first aid kits, water, non-perishable food), staff training on evacuation procedures, and regular fire drills.
Cybersecurity Measures: Implementing encryption protocols, conducting regular system audits, and educating staff about cybersecurity best practices to protect sensitive data.
Business Continuity Plans: Establishing procedures for continuing educational activities remotely, should physical classes be interrupted due to a disaster or pandemic.
Supplier Diversification: Identifying alternative suppliers for critical educational materials to reduce dependency on a single vendor.

Example:

In the case of a cyberattack, Kinderland may adopt measures such as regular software updates, network security enhancements, and employee training on phishing and other cyber threats.

Additionally, in the event of a natural disaster, a detailed evacuation plan would be crucial to ensure the safety of children and staff.

4. Continuous Review

The final step of the Risk Analysis and Review phase is the continuous review of the risk profile.

The business environment, emerging threats, and internal changes can all affect the risk landscape.

Therefore, Kinderland must regularly revisit the risk analysis process to ensure that new risks are identified and existing risks are reassessed.

This can be done by:

Regular Risk Assessments: Conducting periodic reviews (quarterly, annually) to reassess risks based on any changes in operations, legislation, or external factors.
Feedback Loops: Encouraging feedback from staff, parents, and other stakeholders to identify potential threats that might not be obvious from an organisational perspective.
Scenario Testing: Conducting simulation exercises or "table-top" exercises to test the organisation's preparedness for various risk scenarios.

Example:

For Kinderland, continuous review might include monitoring health advisories from the government to prepare for a potential outbreak of a new infectious disease or conducting mock drills to assess the adequacy of evacuation plans.

The Risk Analysis and Review phase of BCM is essential for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks that could threaten the continuity of Kinderland's educational services.

By systematically analysing and addressing potential threats, Kinderland can ensure that it is well-prepared to maintain its operations in the face of adversity, safeguard the well-being of its students and staff, and comply with regulatory requirements.

Ultimately, the goal is to build a resilient organisation that can withstand disruptions and continue to deliver high-quality early childhood education, no matter the circumstances.

More Information About Business Continuity Management Courses

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and the BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5].