The templates should be adapted to reflect the organisation’s size, complexity, regulatory environment, risk profile, governance structure, and operational resilience maturity.
|
Score |
Description |
Interpretation |
|
5 |
Optimised |
Fully embedded, measured, evidenced, and continuously improved |
|
4 |
Effective |
Well implemented and operating effectively |
|
3 |
Generally Effective |
Core capability established with manageable weaknesses |
|
2 |
Partially Effective |
Significant gaps or inconsistent implementation |
|
1 |
Initial |
Limited capability and largely informal |
|
0 |
Not Established |
Requirement is absent |
Suggested Finding Severity
|
Rating |
Description |
|
Critical |
Immediate or severe risk to critical business service |
|
High |
Material resilience weakness requiring priority action |
|
Moderate |
Important weakness requiring remediation |
|
Low |
Limited deficiency |
|
Observation |
Enhancement opportunity |
| Assess Capability and Maturity | Analyse Gap | Develop Strategy and Roadmap | Confirm Risk Appetite | Develop and Embed Governance | |
Contact our course consultant colleagues to learn more about our blended learning program and about the next course's schedule. They are the BL-OR-3 Blended Learning OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer and the BL-OR-5 Blended Learning OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer.
|
If you have any questions, click to contact us. |
||
|
|