Operational Resilience

[OR] [BoK 2] [CA] Apply for Certification Analyse Gap in Operational Resilience [P1-S2]

Written by Moh Heng Goh | Jul 11, 2024 3:55:52 AM
Certification Application: Using Operational Resilience Body of Knowledge 2 (OR BoK 2) as part of your experience justification 

Now comes the application process, but identifying areas for improvement can feel daunting. This blog is here to empower you with the power of gap analysis!


This guide showcases how to effectively utilize Operational Resilience Body of Knowledge 2 (OR BoK 2) within your "Plan" Phase 1 - Analyse Gap Stage 2" experience justification for the certification application.

Remember, OR BoK 2 outlines the minimum expected capabilities for an OR professional.

Gap analysis is your secret weapon for a successful certification application. It helps you pinpoint the difference between where your organization stands and the desired operational resilience goals. But how do you translate this analysis into a winning application?

This guide will equip you to utilize gap analysis throughout the application process confidently:

  • Understanding the power of gap analysis: Learn how this method reveals areas where your operational resilience practices need strengthening.
  • Conducting a comprehensive gap analysis: We'll walk you through a step-by-step process to identify gaps between your current practices and certification requirements.
  • Transforming findings into application gold: Discover how to leverage your gap analysis results to demonstrate a proactive approach to operational resilience.

Demonstrating your Expertise


"Analyse Gap" content is included in your application. Click the icon on the right to recap.

This is a brief explanation of the template provided in the certification application form (CAF)

 

 

Evidence of Work Done

[3] When was it done? MM-YYYY to MM-YYYY
[1] What was performed? Per the specific OR BoK?

Detail the particular operational resilience practices you implemented.  This is in line with the content of the OR BoK that you learned during the course.  

(Estimate of a minimum of 200 words)

  
[2] How was it carried out?

This is a write-up of your actual implementation and contribution to the specific OR BoK within your organisation. You must demonstrate the completion of these particular OR practices.

(Estimate of a minimum of 200 words)

 Please elaborate on the duration of the OR BoK. Was it over three years for ORCE and over one year for ORCS?

In addition, here's how you may want to consider the following when describing your content: What was performed? and How was it carried out?

1. Contextualize: Briefly establish the specific project or organization where you applied the principles.

2. Map stages to experience: Link each step in "Analyse gap" to a concrete example from your work.

3. Provide evidence: Support your claims with tangible proof, such as:

  • Documents: Risk assessments, reports, meeting minutes, and project plans.
  • Metrics: Quantitative data demonstrating impact (e.g., risk score reduction).
  • Testimonials: References from colleagues or project stakeholders.

4. Quantify duration: Mention your time at each stage, highlighting your dedicated engagement.

5. Go beyond the minimum: While meeting specific standards of BoK expectations is essential, demonstrate how you exceeded them by adding further value. Did you develop innovative approaches? Lead a team through the process? Share such advancements to showcase your initiative and leadership.

Areas of Expertise for OR BoK 2 [P1-S2]

 

Demonstrate Your Actual "Practical" Experience and the period you execute these activities for more than one year (Specialist) or three years (Expert)
Identify Potential Threats

No organization is immune to disruption. Conduct a thorough risk assessment to pinpoint potential threats and vulnerabilities

  • Disruptive Events: What events could disrupt your operations (e.g., cyberattacks, natural disasters)?
  • Likelihood and Impact: Analyze the probability and potential severity of each threat.
  • Existing Controls: Are there existing safeguards in place to mitigate these risks?
Bridging the Gap

Now comes the heart of the analysis!  Compare your risk assessment findings with your current OR program:

  • Current Policies and Procedures: How well do your existing practices address identified risks?
  • Controls and Mitigation Strategies: Are there gaps in your current controls that leave your organization exposed?
Building Your Action Plan

A gap analysis is only valuable if it leads to action! Develop a roadmap to address the identified gaps:

  • Actionable Initiatives: Create specific actions to improve your OR program based on your findings.
  • Ownership and Accountability: Assign clear ownership for each action item to ensure implementation.
  • Timelines and Milestones: Set realistic timelines and milestones for implementing your action plan.

A well-defined gap analysis is a cornerstone of a robust OR program. Demonstrating your grasp of this process will show the certification reviewers your commitment to continuous improvement.

 

More Information About Blended Learning OR-5000 [BL-OR-5] or OR-300 [BL-OR-3]


To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-3 Blended Learning OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5 Blended Learning OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.

If you have any questions, click to contact us.

View full post