Designing and developing a full-simulation crisis management exercise (or a full-scale exercise) involves creating a highly realistic, immersive scenario that tests an organisation’s crisis response framework under pressure.
![]() |
Pre-reading for Participants Attending Module 4 of the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer Course | ![]() |
This exercise requires extensive planning, coordination, and execution to simulate real-world conditions effectively.
Purpose: Test end-to-end crisis response (e.g., decision-making, communication, resource deployment).
Scope: Simulate a large-scale, high-impact scenario (e.g., cyberattack, natural disaster, workplace violence).
Audience: Involve all critical teams (executives, security, IT, PR, legal, ops, external agencies).
Exercise Director (oversees the entire simulation).
Scenario Designers (develop realistic crisis injects).
Controllers (manage the flow of the exercise).
Evaluators (assess performance and gaps).
Role-Players (act as media, hackers, victims, etc.).
Choose a worst-case but plausible crisis (e.g., ransomware attack + data leak + regulatory scrutiny).
Create a multi-stage timeline (escalating events over hours/days).
Design realistic injects (e.g., fake news reports, simulated system failures, mock law enforcement involvement).
Location: Use real-world settings (HQ, backup sites, virtual war rooms).
Technology:
Simulated IT outages (e.g., mock ransomware screen).
Fake social media/news sites.
Crisis management software (e.g., Everbridge, OnSolve).
Props:
Mock emergency alerts.
Actor scripts (e.g., panicked employees, aggressive reporters).
Participants: Explain rules, objectives, and safety protocols.
Controllers & Evaluators: Ensure they understand their roles.
Media & External Stakeholders (if involved): Brief on simulated roles.
Phase 1: Crisis Eruption (e.g., "Explosion reported at Facility X").
Phase 2: Escalation (e.g., "Casualties reported, media arrives").
Phase 3: Decision-Making Under Pressure (e.g., "CEO must approve a public statement").
Phase 4: Recovery & Lessons Learned (e.g., "IT restores systems, PR handles backlash").
Immediate Feedback: Quick discussion right after the exercise.
Structured Evaluation:
What worked?
What failed?
Were protocols followed?
Were decisions timely and effective?
After-Action Report (AAR): Document findings and update crisis plans.
Scenario: "State-sponsored hackers breach systems, steal data, and demand ransom."
Trigger: IT detects unusual network activity → Confirms ransomware encryption.
Injects:
A fake ransom note appears on the screens.
Hackers leak customer data on dark web.
Media calls for comment.
Regulators demand a breach report within 24h.
Response Tested:
IT incident response.
Executive decision-making.
PR & legal coordination.
Employee & customer communication.
✅ Realism: Make it as lifelike as possible without causing panic.
✅ Psychological Safety: Ensure participants know it’s a learning experience.
✅ Unpredictability: Add unexpected twists (e.g., a key person is unavailable).
✅ Iterative Improvement: Use findings to refine crisis plans.
Crisis Management Platforms: Everbridge, OnSolve, Siemens Xcelerator.
Simulation Software: Tabletop Simulator, CrisisSim.
Fake Media Generators:
Mock news websites (e.g., using WordPress templates).
Simulated social media bots (e.g., Twitter/X parody accounts).
A full simulation crisis exercise is the gold standard for stress-testing an organisation’s readiness. By simulating a high-pressure, real-world scenario, you can identify weaknesses, improve coordination, and build muscle memory for actual crises.
Types of Crisis Management Exercises | ||||
Design and Develop Crisis Management Exercises | ||||
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the CM-300 Crisis Management Implementer [CM-3] and the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer [CM-5].
Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions. |
||||