Operational resilience has evolved beyond traditional risk management and business continuity practices, focusing on an organisation’s ability to deliver critical services amid disruption.
At the heart of this capability lies a fundamental requirement: understanding how different components of the organisation are connected and interdependent.
This is where mapping interconnections and interdependencies becomes essential.
Modern organisations—particularly financial institutions—operate within highly complex ecosystems. These ecosystems span internal functions, technology platforms, third-party providers, and cross-border infrastructures.
Disruptions rarely occur in isolation; instead, they propagate through interconnected systems, often leading to cascading failures.
Without a clear understanding of these relationships, organisations cannot effectively anticipate, withstand, or recover from disruptions.
It also highlights the importance of adopting a service-centric perspective, which is a key principle underpinning modern regulatory expectations and operational resilience frameworks.
Interconnections refer to the linkages and interactions between various components within an organisation or across external entities.
These connections describe how different elements communicate, exchange data, or rely on each other to function effectively.
Examples include:
Interdependencies refer to the mutual reliance among interconnected components, in which the functioning of one element depends on the availability or performance of another.
These dependencies can exist across multiple dimensions:
Together, they form a networked ecosystem that supports the delivery of business services.
Understanding interconnections and interdependencies is central to achieving operational resilience. It enables organisations to move beyond siloed views of risk and develop a holistic understanding of service delivery.
Mapping interconnections provides visibility into:
This visibility allows organisations to proactively identify vulnerabilities before disruptions occur.
Disruptions in one component can trigger chain reactions across interconnected systems. For example:
Interdependency mapping helps organisations understand:
By understanding interdependencies, organisations can:
Interconnections and interdependencies form the foundation for:
Without accurate mapping, scenario testing becomes superficial and fails to reflect real-world complexities.
Operational resilience frameworks emphasise the identification and protection of Critical Business Services (CBS)—the services that, if disrupted, would cause intolerable harm to customers, the organisation, or the broader financial system.
Interconnection mapping is anchored on CBS, not individual processes or systems. This ensures that resilience efforts are aligned with:
For each CBS, organisations must map:
This creates a complete view of how the service is delivered from initiation to completion.
Interconnections and interdependencies mapping directly support:
For a CBS such as Payments and Funds Transfer Services, mapping would include:
Each of these components is interconnected and interdependent, forming the service delivery chain.
Historically, organisations focused on:
This approach often resulted in:
Operational resilience requires a shift to a service-centric perspective, where the focus is on:
|
Process-Centric View |
Service-Centric View |
|
Focus on internal activities |
Focus on external service outcomes |
|
Siloed departmental perspective |
End-to-end organisational view |
|
Limited dependency visibility |
Full interdependency mapping |
|
Recovery of individual components |
Continuity of the entire service |
A service-centric approach ensures that:
This aligns with regulatory expectations that organisations must demonstrate the ability to deliver critical services under disruption, rather than simply recover individual systems or processes.
Interconnections and interdependencies form the foundation of operational resilience. They provide the visibility and understanding required to manage complexity, anticipate disruptions, and ensure continuity of critical services.
By defining how components are linked and how they depend on one another, organisations can shift from reactive recovery planning to proactive resilience management.
This capability is essential in today’s interconnected environment, where disruptions can rapidly cascade across systems, functions, and external partners.
Most importantly, this chapter establishes the need for a service-centric approach, anchored on Critical Business Services.
This perspective ensures that resilience efforts are aligned with what truly matters—the sustained delivery of services to customers and stakeholders.
In the following chapters, we will build on these foundations by exploring the methodologies, tools, and practical steps required to map interconnections and interdependencies effectively, in alignment with the Operational Resilience Planning Methodology (OR-P2-S2).
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 |
| C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 | |
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.
|
If you have any questions, click to contact us. |
||
|
|