The “Framework” is a broad overview or outline of interlinked items that support the CM approach in meeting an organisation's specific objective.
For any crisis management framework to be practical, there is a requirement to have the crucial component of crisis management identified and integrated.
Mitroff and Pearson (1993) pointed out that most crisis procedures are ineffective because they fail to explicitly and systematically explain how to respond to the four CM components.
Key Components for Crisis Management
The four CM components are categorised into types, stages, systems, and interested parties.
“Types” refer to the scope of the CM plan. It answers the following questions:
The “Stages” and “Phases” address each crisis phase's activities and management issues. The three stages of crisis are:
In contrast to the business continuity management planning, the “Phases” refers to the six “Rs”. It corresponds to the activity sequence before, during and after an incident. They are:
Stages of a Crisis.
The “Systems” examines the causes of the crisis. These sub-variables and their interaction can be identified as having a critical influence on the origin of the crisis. They are categorised as:
An Interested Party is often called any person, group or entity with a genuine and direct interest. It can make decisions that will result in a recognisable stake in the outcome of an organization.
Identify Interested Parties.
Developing a crisis management capability needed to be strategically directed from the top of an organization and implemented through a crisis management framework.
One aspect of this is that executive management should establish, define and document policy for crisis management that:
The policy should serve as the basis and business case for further activities related to the planning and implementation of crisis management procedures.
The policy statement should identify those responsible for its different elements, coordination, and embedding of crisis management as a mainstream activity.
The policy statement should:
People’s knowledge, skills, and experience should be considered. The organization should also consider the resources needed for each capability element and the associated training requirements.
It should also appoint a person(s) with the appropriate authority to be accountable for developing and implementing crisis management capability and its ongoing maintenance and management across the organization.
There should be an enterprise-level strategy. This includes the policy-driven requirement that the crisis management program exists to support or otherwise safeguard every employee in every company worldwide, regardless of political or organizational alignment or the individual's functional role.
Goh, M. H. (2016). A Manager’s Guide to Implement Your Crisis Management Plan. Business Continuity Management Specialist Series (1st ed., p. 192). Singapore: GMH Pte Ltd.
Extracted from Develop CM Framework
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the CM-300 Crisis Management Implementer [CM-3] and the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer [CM-5].
Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions. |
||