While both concepts are crucial for crisis preparedness, they serve distinct purposes.
The reply is that it lies in their scope and purpose. This is a simple comparison of the differences.
Crisis Management | ||
Feature | Crisis Lifecycle | Crisis Management Planning Methodology |
Focus | Describes the natural stages a crisis typically goes through | Provides a structured approach to prepare for and respond to crises |
Purpose | Helps understand the evolution of a crisis and its impact | Guides the development of a crisis management program and response strategy |
Actionable |
Limited direct action focuses on understanding the crisis flow | Provides a roadmap for taking concrete steps in preparation and response. |
Example | A natural disaster might unfold pre-crisis, during-crisis (event and recovery stages) and post-crisis | A methodology helps develop an implementation plan for different stakeholders during a crisis |
Analogy | Think of it as the natural history of a disease. It describes the different phases of the illness, helping doctors understand its progression. | This is like a treatment plan for the disease. It outlines the steps to take for diagnosis, treatment, and recovery |
Stages |
Key Takeaways is that the crisis lifecycle helps you understand the overall flow of a crisis.
The crisis management planning methodology equips you with tools to prepare for and respond to a crisis at each stage of its lifecycle.
By understanding both concepts, organizations can:
Goh, M. H. (2016). A Manager’s Guide to Implement Your Crisis Management Plan. Business Continuity Management Specialist Series (1st ed., p. 192). Singapore: GMH Pte Ltd.
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the CM-300 Crisis Management Implementer [CM-3] and the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer [CM-5].
Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions. |
||