In the realm of crisis management and business continuity, effective risk assessment is the cornerstone of strategic preparedness.
This chapter—Part 3: RAR – Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment—guides practitioners through the systematic evaluation of risks by examining both their potential impact and the likelihood of occurrence.
By quantifying and prioritising risks, organisations gain the clarity needed to allocate resources wisely, strengthen their risk posture, and enhance resilience.
This section introduces key assessment criteria, risk rating matrices, and practical approaches to calibrate and contextualise threats in alignment with organisational objectives and risk appetite.
This is the structured Risk Impact & Likelihood Assessment table for Credit Guarantee Corporation Malaysia, based on threats selected from Part 1: RAR – List of Threats.
|
Threat |
Finance |
Operations |
Legal & Regulatory |
Reputation & Image |
Social Responsibility |
People |
Assets/IT Systems/Information |
Risk Impact Area (Max Score) |
Risk Likelihood |
Risk Rating |
Risk Level |
Expected Period of Disruption |
|
Flood |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Operations (4) |
Medium |
16 |
Moderate |
1–3 days |
|
Power Outage |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
IT (4) |
Medium |
14 |
Moderate |
Hours–1 day |
|
IT Failure (hardware/software) |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
IT (5) |
High |
20 |
High |
1–2 days |
|
Infectious Disease / Pandemic |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
People (5) |
High |
24 |
High |
1–4 weeks |
|
Loss of Key Appointment Holders |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
People (4) |
Medium |
16 |
Moderate |
1–2 weeks |
|
Regulatory or Legal Violation (third-party) |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Legal & Regulatory (5) |
Medium |
18 |
High |
2–4 weeks |
|
IT Sabotage (cyber‑attack) |
5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
IT & Finance (5) |
High |
25 |
Extreme |
3–7 days |
|
Network Failure |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
IT (4) |
Medium |
14 |
Moderate |
Hours–1 day |
A well-executed Risk Impact and Likelihood Assessment enables organisations to transition from reactive to proactive risk management.
Through structured analysis and scoring, decision-makers can identify which threats demand immediate attention and which require ongoing monitoring.
As demonstrated in this chapter, the RAR process not only informs risk prioritisation but also lays the groundwork for developing effective mitigation strategies and continuity plans.
With a clear understanding of both impact and likelihood, organisations are better equipped to navigate uncertainties and sustain operations in the face of potential disruptions.
Resilience Redefined: Implementing BCM at Credit Guarantee Corporation Malaysia |
||||||
| eBook 3: Starting Your BCM Implementation |
||||||
| MBCO | P&S | RAR T1 | RAR T2 | RAR T3 | BCS T1 | CBF |
| CBF 1: Risk Assessment and Guarantee Issuance | ||||||
| DP | BIAQ T1 | BIAQ T2 | BIAQ T3 | BCS T2 | BCS T3 | PD |
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and the BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5].
|
Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions. |
||