Malaysian Life Reinsurance Group Berhad (MLRe) is Malaysia's first local life reinsurer, established in 1997. It provides life, health and retakaful reinsurance capacity to life insurers and takaful operators, and holds an AM Best Financial Strength Rating of A- (Excellent). Cedants rely on MLRe to pay claims recoveries on time, to price risk accurately and to remain solvent through stress. That reliance makes the first stage of the Plan phase an honest look at how resilient MLRe is today.
A capability and maturity assessment measures how well an organisation can anticipate, withstand, respond to, and recover from disruption, and how consistently it does so. Capability asks whether MLRe can do something. Maturity asks whether it does so repeatedly, with clear ownership, measurement, and improvement. A reinsurer may have a strong disaster recovery site (capability) yet test it irregularly and without business-owner involvement (low maturity).
For MLRe, the assessment is also a regulatory readiness exercise. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) already expects sound business continuity (Policy Document on Business Continuity Management), technology risk management (RMiT) and outsourcing controls. On 19 December 2025, BNM issued a discussion paper setting out its emerging direction on operational resilience. A baseline assessment shows MLRe where it already meets that direction and where it does not.
The methodology uses a three-step approach: Assess, Analyse, Address.
Senior management and business heads score the current state against agreed OR parameters. For MLRe, the parameters would be grouped as follows:
| Dimension | Example parameters | Example MLRe question |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Board oversight, roles, policies | Does the Board receive regular reports on the resilience of treaty and claims services? |
| Organisational design | Ownership of services, crisis teams | Is there a named owner for claims recovery end to end? |
| Technology | Actuarial and underwriting systems, recovery, cyber | Can the treaty administration system be recovered within the time Underwriting needs? |
| Processes | Documented procedures, workarounds | Are manual fallbacks for bordereaux processing documented and tested? |
| Third parties | Outsourced IT, custodians, retrocessionaires | Are exit and substitution plans in place for critical providers? |
| People | Key-person cover, skills | Are there trained backups for senior actuaries and claims assessors? |
Each parameter is scored on a maturity scale (for example, 1 = ad hoc to 5 = optimised). Results are plotted as a radar (spider) chart for each business area, so strong and weak dimensions are visible at a glance.
The OR team lead reviews all scorecards and radar charts and looks for patterns. If Claims, Underwriting and Finance all score low on third-party dependency, that is an enterprise-wide issue rather than a departmental one. The output is a short list of priority parameters, ranked by their effect on MLRe's most important services and on regulatory expectations.
Senior management and business heads meet to agree how to close the priority weaknesses. They brainstorm options, narrow them with a simple decision tree (cost, effort, risk reduction, regulatory urgency), and place the chosen actions on a Gantt chart. This becomes the first draft of the improvement roadmap that Chapter 5 develops fully.
The examples below show the kind of findings the assessment may produce. They are illustrations for planning discussion, not results of an actual assessment.
Assessing capability and maturity gives MLRe a factual baseline. The scorecards, radar charts, and priority list feed directly into the gap analysis in Chapter 4, and from there into strategy, risk appetite and governance.
| eBook 2: Implementing Operational Resilience for Malaysian Life Reinsurance |
|||
| C1 | C2 | C8 | C14 |
| "Plan" Phase of the Operational Resilience Planning Methodology |
||||||
| C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | |