In the world of operational resilience, scenario testing stands as a critical pillar. Yet, it presents unique challenges that require careful consideration, especially when aligning with regulatory expectations.
Regulators wield the ultimate authority to determine the adequacy of your organisation’s operational resilience efforts.
Your responsibility is to endeavour to meet their expectations and, when necessary, demonstrate the best possible outcome.
However, there may be occasions when the board must step in and candidly acknowledge the limitations while striving to fulfil the set objectives.
The board plays a pivotal role in operational resilience, particularly in scenarios where regulatory discussions are at the forefront.
Central banks or regulatory authorities may scrutinise your resilience strategies, and the board must be prepared to engage in meaningful dialogue.
They advocate for what is achievable while maintaining transparency regarding the organisation’s capabilities.
Unlike traditional business continuity management (BCM) or crisis management testing, scenario testing extends beyond the internal scope. It necessitates the involvement of third-party entities and customers, adding complexity to the testing landscape.
Regulators insist on high-impact scenarios that result in significant disruption. These criteria are not arbitrary but crucial in evaluating an organisation’s resilience.
It is essential to prove that your scenarios are not just another replication of traditional BCM exercises but also scenarios that can test your readiness.
Defining scenarios that are both severe and improbable can be a daunting task. The debate often arises here, as aligning with this criterion can pose a significant challenge.
However, it is vital to recognise that achieving this balance is essential in fulfilling regulatory expectations.
To address the complexity of scenario testing, consider the following strategies:
Operational resilience is a dynamic field requiring organisations to evolve their strategies and practices continuously.
Meeting regulatory expectations in scenario testing demands a thoughtful approach prioritising prevention, active involvement, and adaptability.
By balancing severe scenarios and improbable events, organisations can demonstrate their commitment to resilience while effectively navigating the complexities of regulatory compliance.
OR Planning Methodology Phases |
Plan | Implement | Sustain | ||
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-3 Blended Learning OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5 Blended Learning OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.