Operational Resilience Body of Knowledge (OR BoK) Series
Conduct Scenario Testing
This blog explains the purpose and significance of Conducting Scenario Testing as Stage 4 of the Implement phase of the Operational Resilience (OR) Planning Methodology.
It demonstrates how organisations validate their ability to continue delivering critical business services within approved impact tolerances by testing against severe but plausible disruption scenarios.
The blog guides readers through developing realistic scenarios, executing end-to-end tests, evaluating response and recovery capabilities, identifying operational vulnerabilities, and documenting findings for improvement.
It also highlights the importance of Board oversight, governance, and continuous enhancement of resilience capabilities based on test outcomes.
For Operational Resilience practitioners and OR course participants, the blog provides a complete understanding of how scenario testing moves operational resilience from planning to practical validation, ensuring that resilience strategies, response arrangements, and recovery capabilities are proven before real disruptions occur.
Element
|
Description
|
|
Purpose
|
- To evaluate the organisation’s current resilience maturity, capability, and readiness to embark on the Operational Resilience (OR) journey.
- This provides a baseline for strategy, governance, and resource allocation.
|
| Objectives |
- Determine the current maturity of resilience across critical business services, functions, and dependencies.
- Benchmark resilience capability against regulations, supervisory requirements, and best practices (e.g., ISO 22316).
- Identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas requiring improvement.
- Establish a roadmap to guide the organisation’s OR journey.
|
|
Inputs
|
- Existing BCM, IT disaster recovery, crisis management, and risk management documentation.
- Regulatory and supervisory guidelines.
- Organisational policies, governance frameworks, and internal audit reports.
- Stakeholder expectations, customer outcomes, and defined risk tolerances.
|
|
Activities
|
- Conduct a maturity assessment using structured frameworks or diagnostic tools.
- Review existing resilience practices (e.g., BCM, cyber resilience, vendor management, operational risk).
- Evaluate governance structures, accountabilities, and ownership for resilience.
- Identify critical business services and their dependencies.
- Benchmark current practices against regulatory expectations and industry norms.
- Document current capabilities, gaps, and resourcing needs.
|
|
Outputs
|
- OR Capability and Maturity Assessment Report.
- Gap analysis report identifying resilience strengths and weaknesses.
- A maturity roadmap aligned to regulatory and business requirements.
- Recommendations for leadership awareness and resource prioritisation.
|
|
Linkages
|
- Provides a baseline for P1-S2: Define Scope and Governance.
- Informs P2: Implement phase by identifying capability gaps.
- Links with BCMBoK 2 (Risk Analysis & Review) and BCMBoK 7 (Program Management).
- Aligns with regulatory and industry standards to support compliance and supervisory expectations.
|
"Implement" Phase of OR Planning Methodology
| Identify Critical Business Services |
Map Inter-connections and Inter-dependencies |
Set Impact Tolerance
|
Conduct Scenario Testing |
Improve Lesson Learned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Operational Resilience Body of Knowledge - Implement |
| BoK 6 S1 |
BoK 7 S2 |
BoK 8 S3 |
BoK 9 S4 |
BoK 10 S5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Information About Operational Resilience OR-5000 [BL-OR-5] or OR-300 [BL-OR-3] Course
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-3 Blended Learning OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5 Blended Learning OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have any questions, click to contact us.
|
|
|
|
|
|