Below is a proposed structure tailored to Marymount Centre’s operational needs.
Chairperson: Executive Director
Why: Ensures strategic alignment with organisational goals and provides authority to enforce BCM policies.
Members: Heads of critical departments (e.g., Operations, IT, HR, Finance, Communications).
Why: Cross-departmental collaboration addresses all operational risks and recovery priorities holistically.
Role: Dedicated BCM Manager or Senior Staff Member
Responsibilities: Oversees BCM plan development, maintenance, and drills; acts as the central liaison between departments.
Operations Lead: Focuses on service continuity (e.g., childcare, elder programs).
IT Lead: Manages data security, system backups, and digital infrastructure recovery.
HR Lead: Addresses staff safety, remote work protocols, and crisis staffing.
Finance Lead: Ensures liquidity, fund access, and financial risk mitigation.
Communications Lead: Manages internal/external messaging during disruptions.
Leader: Deputy Director or Senior Manager
Members: IT Lead, Communications Lead, Operations Lead.
Role: Activates during crises to execute immediate response plans and coordinate recovery.
Functional Recovery Units: Department-specific teams (e.g., IT Recovery, Facility Restoration) tasked with resuming critical functions post-incident.
Partners: Local authorities, vendors, and cybersecurity experts.
Role: Facilitate swift resource mobilisation (e.g., emergency supplies, IT support).
Role: Conducts regular BCM workshops, simulations, and post-drill reviews.
Marymount Centre’s inferred structure (likely led by an Executive Director with departmental heads) ensures the BCM team leverages existing roles to avoid redundancy. For example:
The IT Head, already managing infrastructure, would lead IT recovery efforts.
The Communications Head responsible for stakeholder engagement would handle crisis messaging.
Authority & Accountability: The Steering Committee must have decision-making power to allocate resources and enforce compliance.
Scenario-Based Planning: Tailor recovery strategies to risks relevant to community centres (e.g., pandemics, IT outages, natural disasters).
Regular Drills: Simulate disruptions like facility evacuations or data breaches to test response efficacy.
Community Focus: Ensure vulnerable groups (e.g., elderly, children) are prioritized in continuity plans.
A layered BCM structure—combining leadership oversight, departmental expertise, and external partnerships—will empower Marymount Centre to navigate crises while upholding its mission.
By embedding BCM roles into its existing framework, the Centre can foster resilience without disrupting daily operations. Regular updates and stakeholder engagement will further solidify its preparedness, ensuring continuity in serving Singapore’s community.
Note: During implementation, a visual hierarchy chart aligning the BCM team with Marymount Centre’s current organizational chart is recommended for optimal clarity.
This chapter is part 1 of the eBook "Blueprint for Resilience: A Step-by-Step BCM Framework for Marymount Centre." Part 1 of the eBook is titled "Foundations of Resilience: BCM Essentials for Marymount Centre", which provides a comprehensive guide to implementing a BCM system in alignment with ISO 22301
Blueprint for Resilience: A Step-by-Step BCM Framework for Marymount Centre |
|||
Foundations of Resilience: BCM Essentials for Marymount Centre |
|||
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and the BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5].