ReferenceGoh, M. H. (2016). A Manager's Guide to Implementing Your IT Disaster Recovery Plan. Business Continuity Management Specialist Series (2nd ed.). Singapore: GMH Pte Ltd. Extracted from"Request-for-Proposal (RFP) for IT DR Services" |
Provision of good background information on the history of DR activities in your organization will be very useful when you are setting up a RFP process.
These are some of the information needed. The key areas are:
Part 1 |
Part 2 |
|
|
The baseline for carrying out a successful RFP evaluation is the evaluation criteria that determine the effectiveness with which you can compare and evaluate all the proposals received.
There are many ways to implement the evaluation criteria:
In the following sections, we will look into details of mandatory portions that you have to be satisfied with, before being able to accept the vendor’s proposal and recommend to the management for approval.
Check and confirm that all mandatory legal requirements are accepted by the vendors. If there are deviations, you have to decide whether they are acceptable and present minimum risks to your organization.
At the same time, also, ensure the compliance and level of liquidity damages, if any, are sufficient to address the level of commitment to the vendor in delivering the plan.
Ensure all proposed hardware, software and network equipment are similar to that you have requested in the RFP. If not, provide equivalent functions and capacity that can meet expected RTO and RPO requirements to address your business needs.
The DR delivery methodology is important and critical to ensuring the DR scope and objectives can be met. Thus, thoroughly check and confirm the details of how the vendor intends to manage and deliver the expected services using this methodology.
For any DR Planning project, the experience of the Organization DR Coordinator from the vendor is the key driving force towards successful delivery of the project; likewise, the technical expertise. To be able to react to unforeseen circumstances, ensure replacements are available in a short time. This is to minimize the impact, and delays to the delivery schedules.
You have to examine the qualifications of each that the vendor is going to deploy to deliver your project. If any of the individuals are unacceptable, immediately inform the vendor and request for a replacement.
Although checking the references provided by the Vendors are very useful for your verification of the Vendor’s performance and capability. You must bear in mind that the Vendors will not give a customer’s reference that will give adverse views on their organization and services. So, you must also check with your peers or network to find out the quality of the Vendors.
Anyway, we would like to provide some key questions that you may want to verify with the references provided by the Vendor or through your personal or business contacts.
Apart from ensuring the proposed cost is reasonable and acceptable according to your RFP’s requirements, check carefully to ensure there are no hidden costs. Once you have established that the cost is final, make it clear to the vendor that this is the final cost mutually agreed on and any associated costs not discussed will be absorbed by the vendor.
Some of the basic costs to consider during the evaluation process include:
After negotiating and agreeing with all the scope, schedule, items, deliverables and pricing of the proposal with the most suitable Vendor, carry out the formal contract award with the Vendor upon your management’s approval.
However, before you sign on the dotted line, be careful that all the following documentations are included in the full contract document: