While CM and BCM share the common goal of organisational resilience, they differ in scope and execution.
Key Distinction: Crisis management responds to a sudden, high-impact event, whereas business continuity management ensures long-term recovery and operational sustainability.
In the context of CM and BCM at SMU, a crisis scenario and a disaster are related but distinct concepts. CM focuses on managing crisis scenarios, while the BCM Team focuses on managing disasters.
A crisis scenario is a sudden or developing situation threatening SMU’s operations, reputation, safety, or stakeholders.
These situations require immediate response and decision-making to mitigate risks and prevent escalation. Crisis scenarios can be unpredictable and may or may not result in long-term disruptions.
SMU is exposed to various crisis scenarios that could impact academic continuity, campus safety, and institutional reputation. The following are key crises that the university must prepare for:
Crisis scenarios do not always lead to physical damage, but if not managed properly, they can significantly impact the university’s reputation, operations, and stakeholders.
On the other hand, a disaster refers to a catastrophic event that causes widespread damage or disruption to SMU’s infrastructure, operations, or safety.
Disasters typically require long-term recovery efforts, addressed in the university’s Business Continuity Management (BCM) plan.
In addition to crisis management, SMU maintains a comprehensive Business Continuity Management (BCM) plan to ensure operational resilience. The key disasters covered include:
Aspect |
Crisis Scenario |
Disaster |
Methodology |
Crisis Management |
Business Continuity Management |
Nature |
A developing or immediate threat requiring rapid response. |
A large-scale, destructive event causing significant damage. |
Impact |
It can affect reputation, operations, or safety without causing physical damage. |
Causes severe operational disruptions and physical damage. |
Response Approach |
Managed through crisis response strategies, often requiring coordination with stakeholders. |
Managed through business continuity and disaster recovery plans. |
Duration |
Typically, it is short-term and can escalate if not managed properly. |
Often long-term, requiring extensive recovery efforts. |
SMU’s approach to crisis management and business continuity is a proactive effort to safeguard its students, faculty, and operations.
At SMU, crisis scenarios are managed through its Crisis Management (CM) Plan to prevent escalation, while disasters are addressed under the BCM Plan to ensure recovery and resilience.
Both require coordinated response efforts, but the scale, impact, and duration of response differ significantly.
By aligning with ISO 22361, SMU can effectively anticipate, respond to, and recover from crises. Through continuous improvement, training, and stakeholder engagement, the university remains resilient despite ever-evolving threats.
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the CM-300 Crisis Management Implementer [CM-3] and the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer [CM-5].
Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions. |
||||