eBook CM

[CM] [PM] [ISO] [P1] Project Management with ISO22361 Elements

Written by Moh Heng Goh | 20 Sep, 2024 6:55:07 AM

Project Management with ISO ISO22361 Elements

Effective project management is the foundation of any successful crisis management plan. Phase 1: Project Management in the Crisis Management (CM) Planning Methodology focuses on establishing a clear roadmap for the entire planning process.

This phase involves defining project goals, assembling a skilled team, and outlining a realistic timeline for completion. It also includes creating a communication plan to keep stakeholders informed and ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently.

This phase ensures the CM Plan is well-structured, organised, and aligned with the organisation’s strategic goals.

Similarly, ISO 22361:2022 emphasises the importance of robust project management as a critical aspect of developing a practical crisis management framework. The standard outlines requirements for defining the CM Plan's scope, objectives, and governance structure.

It highlights the need for leadership commitment, adequate resource allocation, and clear communication channels throughout the project lifecycle.

This comparison chart will explore the similarities and differences between Phase 1: Project Management in the CM Planning Methodology and the corresponding project management requirements in ISO 22361:2022, illustrating how both approaches contribute to building a structured and resilient crisis management program.

Detailed Comparison Between Phase 1: Project Management of CM Planning Methodology vs. ISO 22361:2022 Standard

Objectives and Focus

 

 

Crisis Management Planning Methodology: Phase 1 - Project Management

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 Standard

 

 

The main objective is to initiate the planning process by defining goals, assembling the right team, and setting up the scope and timeline. This phase focuses on building a project roadmap and aligning stakeholders.

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 emphasises the need for organisations to define the scope of crisis management as part of their broader resilience framework. Leadership commitment, resource allocation, and defining roles and responsibilities are crucial.

 

 

Focus: Establishing a solid foundation for the CM program through goal-setting, team formation, and project scope definition.

 

 

Focus: Ensuring the organisation's structure and leadership align with CM objectives. Crisis management must be integrated into the organization’s governance and operational systems.

 

Leadership Commitment and Resource Allocation

 

 

Crisis Management Planning Methodology: Phase 1 - Project Management

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 Standard

 

 

Establishment of Project Team: The methodology highlights the importance of assembling a dedicated project team with the necessary expertise. Team members must lead the development of the CM Plan, ensuring proper project.

 

 

Leadership Commitment: ISO 22361 mandates top management involvement, requiring that they provide oversight, allocate resources, and ensure that the CM structure is aligned with organisational strategy. The commitment from top leadership is critical to successful crisis management.

 

 

Resource Allocation: To ensure success, resources, including time, budget, and personnel, should be efficiently allocated during the project planning phase.

 

 

Resource Management: ISO 22361 emphasizes allocating adequate human, technological, and financial resources for effective crisis management. Leaders must ensure that the CM Team has the support to function effectively.

 

Comparison

The crisis management planning methodology and ISO 22361 emphasise the need for dedicated resources and a capable team. However, ISO 22361 emphasises top leadership commitment, ensuring that crisis management is embedded into the organisation's overall governance.

Project Goals and Objectives

 

 

Crisis Management Planning Methodology: Phase 1 - Project Management

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 Standard

 

 

Goals and Objectives: The project team must clearly define the crisis management planning project's goals and objectives. These objectives will guide the development of the CM strategy and ensure alignment with organisational goals.

 

 

Crisis Management Policy: ISO 22361 requires the development of a crisis management policy aligned with the organization's broader resilience and risk management objectives. This policy should outline high-level objectives, responsibilities, and the scope of the CM efforts.

 

 

Stakeholder Alignment: To ensure buy-in, key stakeholders must be identified and informed about the project’s objectives.

 

 

Stakeholder Involvement: ISO 22361 specifies that relevant stakeholders must be involved in the crisis management process. The policy should be communicated across the organisation to ensure everyone understands the objectives and expectations.

 

Comparison

Both emphasise the importance of setting clear objectives and involving stakeholders. ISO 22361 goes further by requiring the development of a formal crisis management policy, ensuring organisational alignment with the CM Plan.

Project Scope and Timeline

 

 

Crisis Management Planning Methodology: Phase 1 - Project Management

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 Standard

 

 

Project Scope: This phase involves determining the scope of the crisis management project, outlining the deliverables, and defining the boundaries for the CM Plan. The scope should be realistic and based on available resources.

 

 

Scope of Crisis Management: ISO 22361 requires defining the scope of the CM Plan. The plan should account for the organisation’s critical functions, risks, and potential crises, ensuring that the plan is comprehensive enough to address these elements.

 

 

Timeline and Milestones: The methodology suggests outlining a realistic timeline with clear milestones for the completion of each phase. This helps ensure timely project execution.

 

 

Implementation and Maintenance: ISO 22361 highlights the need for ongoing review and updates to the crisis management plan. This suggests the plan is not static and must evolve, with clear checkpoints and updates as new threats emerge.

 

Comparison

Both approaches involve setting a realistic scope and timeline for developing a CM Plan. ISO 22361 requires ongoing review and update mechanisms to ensure the plan remains relevant.

Communication and Stakeholder Engagement

 

 

Crisis Management Planning Methodology: Phase 1 - Project Management

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 Standard

 

 

Communication Plan: A communication plan must be established to inform stakeholders about the project’s progress. This ensures transparency and encourages stakeholder engagement.

 

 

Internal and External Communication: ISO 22361 emphasises the need for effective communication channels, both internally and externally, during crisis management. The CM Plan should outline how critical information will be shared with key stakeholders and crisis management teams.

 

 

Project Updates: The methodology encourages regular updates to ensure all involved parties are informed about the progress, challenges, and next steps.

 

 

Stakeholder Communication: ISO 22361 requires organisations to ensure that crisis communication strategies are well-planned and practised. Communication should be clear, concise, and appropriate to the audience.

 

Comparison

Both methodologies emphasise effective communication with stakeholders. However, ISO 22361 is more specific in its requirement for formal crisis communication strategies, which include pre-defined messaging for internal and external parties.

Monitoring and Reporting

 

 

Crisis Management Planning Methodology: Phase 1 - Project Management

 

 

ISO 22361:2022 Standard

 

 

Monitoring Project Progress: The project team should regularly monitor the progress against the plan’s timeline and scope, reporting on the project’s status. Adjustments should be made as necessary to stay on track.

 

 

Plan Review and Monitoring: ISO 22361 mandates regularly monitoring and reviewing the CM Plan. This ensures that the organisation keeps up with changes in its operational environment and adjusts the plan accordingly.

 

 

Adjustments and Corrections: If the project goes off track, adjustments should be made to correct the course. Regular review meetings ensure the project remains aligned with its goals.

 

 

Continuous Improvement: ISO 22361 requires organisations to implement a system of constant improvement. This includes learning from past crises, updating the plan, and enhancing the organisation’s resilience.

 

Comparison

Both stress the importance of monitoring and making adjustments as necessary. ISO 22361’s focus on continuous improvement ensures that the CM Plan evolves with the organization and its external environment.

Summary of Key Differences and Similarities

Leadership Commitment

While the Crisis Management Planning Methodology recognizes the need for a dedicated team, ISO 22361 formalises the requirement for top management involvement, ensuring leadership oversight in crisis management.

Integration into Organisational Framework

ISO 22361 explicitly requires crisis management to be part of the organisation's broader resilience and risk management framework. In contrast, the CM Planning Methodology focuses more narrowly on the project’s planning aspects.

Communication and Stakeholder Engagement

Both methodologies highlight the need for effective communication, but ISO 22361 provides more detailed requirements for ongoing communication throughout the crisis management lifecycle, especially during a crisis.

Ongoing Review and Updates

ISO 22361 emphasises continuous improvement and ongoing review of the crisis management plan to ensure its relevance. The project management methodology emphasises the initial plan’s development but less on its constant evolution.

This detailed comparison shows that while Phase 1: Project Management in the CM Planning Methodology and ISO 22361:2022 share common objectives, ISO 22361 provides a more structured and integrated approach that aligns with broader organisational resilience frameworks and emphasises continuous improvement and leadership commitment.

Summing up...

Both the Crisis Management Planning Methodology and ISO 22361:2022 emphasise the critical role of project management in developing effective CM Plans.

While both approaches share common objectives, ISO 22361 provides a more structured and integrated framework that aligns with broader organisational resilience goals.

Key differences include ISO 22361's stronger emphasis on leadership commitment, integration into organisational governance, and continuous plan review. Both methodologies are essential for organisations building a robust and resilient crisis management program.

 

Map Crisis Management Planning Methodology Against ISO2261:2022
 

 

 
Crisis Management Planning Methodology

 

 

More Information About Crisis Management Courses

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the  CM-300 Crisis Management Implementer [CM-3] and the CM-5000 Crisis Management Expert Implementer [CM-5].

Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions.