The Program Management (PgM) phase is the final phase of the Business Continuity Management (BCM) Planning Methodology for The Saudi Mortgage Guarantees Services Company (Damanat).
The preceding phases establish Damanat's BCM capability through a structured implementation process:
Project Management (PM)
Risk Analysis and Review (RAR)
Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
Business Continuity Strategy (BCS)
Plan Development (PD)
Testing and Exercising (TE)
Program Management (PgM)
While the earlier phases establish the initial capability, Program Management ensures that this capability remains effective over time.
This distinction is important.
Business functions change. Employees move into new roles. Technology platforms are replaced. Suppliers change.
New products and services are introduced. Regulatory requirements evolve. New threats emerge. Recovery strategies that were appropriate when initially developed may become inadequate several years—or even several months—later.
Without ongoing Program Management, a Business Continuity Plan can progressively become disconnected from the organisation it is intended to protect.
For Damanat, Program Management should therefore establish a continuous governance and improvement framework that covers BCM policy, management oversight, plan maintenance, BIA and risk review, training, awareness, testing, corrective actions, assurance, performance monitoring, and management review.
The objective is to transition BCM from an implementation project into an embedded organisational management capability.
Earlier chapters focus largely on creating BCM capability. This chapter focuses on sustaining that capability.
It provides a practical framework through which Damanat can:
Program Management should answer the fundamental question:
This chapter benefits Damanat by providing the management structure required to move BCM from a periodic planning exercise into a sustainable organisational discipline.
Effective Program Management helps Damanat to:
Business Continuity Plans and recovery arrangements remain aligned with current operating conditions.
Senior management receives information on BCM capabilities, gaps, exercises, and improvement priorities.
Changes in applicable requirements can be incorporated into BCM policies, processes and evidence.
Employees continue to understand their BCM responsibilities through training, awareness and exercises.
Changes to technology, suppliers, processes and resources are assessed for continuity implications.
Damanat can provide evidence that its BCM arrangements are reviewed, tested, monitored and improved.
Lessons from incidents, exercises, audits and reviews are translated into measurable improvements.
The overall benefit is therefore the establishment of a living BCM program rather than a collection of static Business Continuity Plans.
A distinction should be made between Project Management and Program Management.
Project Management is primarily concerned with implementing the BCM capability.
Program Management is concerned with sustaining it.
|
Project Management |
Program Management |
|
Establishes BCM |
Sustains BCM |
|
Defines initial scope |
Maintains and reviews scope |
|
Establishes governance |
Operates governance |
|
Conducts initial RAR and BIA |
Periodically reviews RAR and BIA |
|
Develops strategies |
Reviews strategy effectiveness |
|
Develops BCPs |
Maintains BCPs |
|
Establishes initial exercise program |
Operates ongoing exercise cycle |
|
Implements capability |
Measures and improves capability |
The transition occurs when the initial BCM implementation is substantially complete, and BCM activities move into a recurring management cycle.
Damanat's Program Management framework should include the following components:
These components collectively provide the mechanisms through which BCM remains embedded within normal organisational management.
Effective Program Management begins with governance.
Damanat should maintain a defined BCM governance structure that establishes:
The BCM governance structure established during Project Management should therefore continue after the implementation project ends.
A typical governance model may include:
Board / Senior Management
↓
BCM Committee
↓
BCM Manager / BCM Function
↓
Heads of Business Units
↓
Business Unit BCM Coordinators
↓
Business Continuity and Recovery Teams
Each level should understand its responsibilities.
The BCM Committee should provide ongoing oversight of the program.
Its responsibilities may include:
Meetings should be supported by documented agendas, minutes, decisions and action records.
Damanat's BCM Policy establishes the organisation's management commitment and overall requirements for business continuity.
The policy should be reviewed periodically and whenever significant changes occur.
The review should consider:
Supporting methodologies should also remain aligned with the policy.
These may include:
Threats and vulnerabilities change over time.
Damanat should therefore periodically review its BCM Threat and Risk Register.
The review should consider changes affecting:
Example
Suppose Damanat migrates its major mortgage-guarantee processing capability to a new technology platform.
The change could introduce:
The existing RAR should therefore be reviewed rather than waiting for the next routine BCM cycle.
BIA information should also be periodically validated.
Business Units should confirm whether:
If Mortgage Guarantee Origination becomes increasingly automated, its dependence on technology may increase while its minimum staffing requirements decrease.
The BIA should reflect these changes.
An outdated BIA leads directly to inappropriate recovery strategies.
Strategies should be periodically reviewed to determine whether they continue to meet approved recovery requirements.
Damanat should ask:
A remote-working strategy designed when 30 employees needed recovery access may no longer be adequate if the current requirement is 80 employees.
Program Management should identify this capacity gap before an actual disruption.
BCPs should be treated as controlled operational documents.
Damanat should establish a formal review cycle and event-driven update process.
Plan maintenance should verify:
Updates should be subject to document control and appropriate approval.
BCPs should not be updated only according to a fixed calendar.
Certain changes should automatically trigger review.
Examples include:
If the primary BCM Coordinator for Mortgage Guarantee Origination leaves Damanat, the relevant BCP should be updated promptly rather than waiting for its next annual review.
Testing and Exercising should operate as a recurring program rather than a collection of isolated tests.
Damanat should maintain an exercise schedule covering:
The exercise program should identify:
Exercise maturity should increase progressively.
Employees with BCM responsibilities should possess the knowledge and skills required to perform their roles.
Training should be role-based.
Training should address:
Training should address:
Training should address:
Training should focus on:
Competency should be reinforced through exercises rather than relying only on classroom instruction.
Training and awareness serve different purposes.
Training develops competency among employees with specific BCM responsibilities.
Awareness ensures that the wider organisation understands basic continuity expectations.
Damanat's awareness program may include:
Employees should at minimum understand:
Every significant incident and exercise should create an opportunity for organisational learning.
Damanat should establish a formal process:
→ Debrief
→ Lessons Identified
→ Root Cause Analysis
→ Corrective Action
→ Owner Assigned
→ Implementation
→ Validation
→ Closure
Lessons should not remain only within exercise reports.
They should feed into relevant:
Program Management should maintain a central BCM Corrective Action Register.
An illustrative structure is:
|
Finding |
Source |
Required Action |
Owner |
Target |
Status |
|
Remote access capacity inadequate |
Exercise |
Increase recovery capacity |
IT |
Q3 |
Open |
|
Contact information outdated |
Call test |
Update recovery contacts |
BU BCM Coordinator |
2 weeks |
Open |
|
Supplier RTO exceeds Damanat requirement |
BIA review |
Review contractual recovery |
Procurement |
Q4 |
Open |
|
Approval authority unclear |
Walkthrough |
Update delegation arrangement |
BU Head |
1 month |
Completed |
|
Data restoration exceeds RPO |
DR Test |
Improve recovery arrangement |
IT |
Q3 |
Open |
Significant overdue actions should be escalated through BCM governance.
Damanat's BCM capability can be weakened by dependencies on suppliers that cannot meet required recovery objectives.
Program Management should therefore maintain oversight of critical suppliers.
The process may include:
If an external technology provider supports a service required by Mortgage Guarantee Origination within four hours, Damanat should determine whether that provider can support the same recovery requirement.
If the provider's recovery commitment is 24 hours, a significant dependency gap exists.
Program Management should be integrated with organisational change.
When Damanat introduces a significant new service, process, technology or supplier, BCM implications should be assessed as part of the change rather than after implementation.
A BCM change assessment could ask:
This makes BCM proactive rather than reactive.
Damanat should establish Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to monitor the BCM program.
Possible indicators include:
|
Indicator |
Example Measure |
|
BIA Currency |
% of BIAs reviewed within the required cycle |
|
BCP Currency |
% of BCPs currently approved |
|
Exercise Completion |
% of planned exercises completed |
|
Exercise Success |
% achieving defined objectives |
|
RTO Achievement |
% of tested functions meeting RTO |
|
Training |
% of BCM personnel completing required training |
|
Corrective Actions |
% closed by target date |
|
Supplier Assurance |
% of critical suppliers assessed |
|
Contact Accuracy |
% of recovery contacts successfully validated |
|
Audit Findings |
Number of overdue significant BCM findings |
The purpose of measurement is not to produce large volumes of statistics. Metrics should help management determine whether Damanat's continuity capability is improving or deteriorating.
A management dashboard may summarise the overall status of the BCM program.
For example:
|
BCM Area |
Status |
Key Observation |
|
RAR |
Current |
Annual review completed |
|
BIA |
Attention Required |
Two functions overdue |
|
BCP |
Current |
95% approved |
|
Testing |
Attention Required |
One DR test below RTO |
|
Training |
Current |
Recovery-team training completed |
|
Suppliers |
Attention Required |
One critical supplier recovery gap |
|
Corrective Actions |
Attention Required |
Three overdue actions |
|
Audit |
Current |
No major outstanding findings |
The dashboard should support decision-making and escalation.
Damanat should periodically assess whether its BCM program is operating as intended.
Assurance may include:
The review should evaluate both:
Design Effectiveness – Are appropriate BCM controls and arrangements defined?
and
Operating Effectiveness – Are those controls actually implemented and working?
For example, requiring that every BCP be tested annually demonstrates design.
Evidence that the exercises occurred, findings were documented, and corrective actions were completed demonstrates operating effectiveness.
Independent review provides management with greater confidence that BCM arrangements are not being assessed solely by the individuals responsible for operating them.
Independent assurance may examine:
Findings should be formally tracked to closure.
Senior management should periodically review the effectiveness of the BCM program.
The management review should consider:
Management review should result in decisions and actions rather than functioning only as a reporting meeting.
Possible outcomes include:
For Damanat, the Program Management phase should establish several specific requirements.
Damanat should maintain clearly assigned BCM ownership, senior management oversight and Business Unit accountability.
Risk assessments and BIAs should be periodically reviewed and updated following material changes to organisational, process, technology, supplier, or location.
Each relevant Business Unit should have a current, approved and accessible BCP.
Recovery arrangements for people, processes, technology, premises, information and critical suppliers should remain capable of meeting approved recovery requirements.
Damanat should operate a structured testing program that progresses from component and walkthrough activities to integrated and simulation exercises, as appropriate.
Corrective actions should have assigned owners, deadlines, and evidence of escalation and closure.
Personnel assigned continuity and recovery responsibilities should receive appropriate training and participate in exercises.
Critical suppliers supporting priority activities should be assessed for their ability to support Damanat during disruption.
Management should receive periodic information concerning BCM capability, gaps and overdue actions.
The BCM program should be subject to appropriate independent review or audit.
Damanat should maintain evidence demonstrating how applicable regulatory requirements are addressed through BCM policies, processes, plans, exercises and governance.
Requirement 12 — Continually Improve BCM
Lessons from incidents, exercises, audits, reviews and organisational changes should result in measurable improvement.
For Damanat, the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) Business Continuity Management Framework provides an important regulatory reference for ongoing BCM management.
The framework addresses BCM as a continuing management capability rather than simply requiring organisations to prepare Business Continuity Plans.
Accordingly, Damanat's Program Management arrangements should address areas such as:
For implementation purposes, Damanat should maintain a regulatory traceability matrix linking applicable requirements with responsible owners, BCM evidence and review status.
An illustrative structure is:
|
Regulatory Area |
Damanat Program Control |
Evidence |
|
BCM Governance |
BCM Committee |
Terms of reference and minutes |
|
Risk Assessment |
Periodic RAR |
Approved Threat and Risk Register |
|
BIA |
Periodic BIA review |
Approved BIA reports |
|
Business Continuity Planning |
BCP maintenance cycle |
Current approved BCPs |
|
Technology Recovery |
DR program |
DR plans and test results |
|
Testing |
Annual exercise program |
Exercise plans and reports |
|
Training |
Role-based training |
Training records |
|
Supplier Continuity |
Third-party review |
Supplier BCM assessments |
|
Corrective Actions |
Improvement process |
Corrective Action Register |
|
Independent Review |
Internal/external assurance |
Audit or review reports |
|
Management Oversight |
Periodic reporting |
BCM dashboard and management review |
This traceability provides Damanat with an organised evidence base for management assurance and regulatory review.
A practical annual BCM cycle for Damanat could follow this sequence:
Quarter 1
Review BCM policy, governance, RAR and BIA.
Quarter 2
Review continuity strategies, BCPs and critical supplier arrangements.
Quarter 3
Conduct planned exercises and technology recovery testing.
Quarter 4
Complete corrective actions, assurance review, management review and planning for the following year.
This is illustrative rather than prescriptive. Activities should be scheduled according to Damanat's operational and regulatory requirements.
More importantly, material changes should trigger immediate BCM review rather than waiting for the next annual cycle.
Consider Mortgage Guarantee Origination.
During initial BCM implementation, Damanat may have:
Program Management then ensures that this capability remains effective.
For example:
Damanat introduces a new guarantee processing platform.
Review:
Conduct a component- or integrated-recovery test.
The new application can be restored within the required RTO, but the external interface requires additional recovery time.
Improve the interface recovery arrangement.
Validate the complete Mortgage Guarantee Origination recovery chain.
This demonstrates how Program Management keeps BCM aligned with organisational change.
Damanat should maintain, at minimum:
|
Ref |
Deliverable |
Purpose |
|
PgM-01 |
BCM Program Management Framework |
Defines ongoing management arrangements |
|
PgM-02 |
BCM Governance Structure |
Maintains accountability |
|
PgM-03 |
BCM Annual Program |
Establishes recurring activities |
|
PgM-04 |
RAR Review Schedule |
Maintains threat assessments |
|
PgM-05 |
BIA Review Schedule |
Maintains recovery requirements |
|
PgM-06 |
BCP Maintenance Schedule |
Maintains plan currency |
|
PgM-07 |
Testing and Exercising Program |
Maintains recovery validation |
|
PgM-08 |
Training Program |
Maintains competency |
|
PgM-09 |
Awareness Program |
Maintains organisational awareness |
|
PgM-10 |
Supplier BCM Review |
Maintains third-party assurance |
|
PgM-11 |
Corrective Action Register |
Tracks improvements |
|
PgM-12 |
BCM Performance Dashboard |
Supports management oversight |
|
PgM-13 |
Regulatory Requirements Register |
Maintains compliance traceability |
|
PgM-14 |
Assurance / Audit Reports |
Provides independent assessment |
|
PgM-15 |
Management Review |
Provides senior management oversight |
|
PgM-16 |
Continual Improvement Register |
Documents capability enhancement |
Unlike earlier BCM phases, Program Management does not have a final completion date.
It represents an ongoing management cycle.
Damanat can, however, assess whether an effective Program Management capability has been established.
This should include confirmation that:
The BCM program can then be considered sustained rather than merely implemented.
The seven-phase methodology should ultimately operate as a continuous lifecycle rather than a linear project.
The initial implementation sequence is:
Once Program Management has been established, the lifecycle continues:
→ Monitor
→ Review
→ Identify Change
→ Reassess Risk
→ Reassess Business Impact
→ Adjust Strategy
→ Update Plans
→ Exercise
→ Learn
→ Improve
→ Monitor Again
For Damanat, this means BCM is never permanently “finished.”
The organisation should instead seek to maintain an appropriate level of readiness as its operating environment evolves.
The complete Damanat BCM Planning Methodology can now be viewed as an integrated management system.
Question: How will BCM implementation be organised?
Outcome: Governance, scope, responsibilities and implementation plan.
Question: What could disrupt Damanat?
Outcome: Threats, vulnerabilities, controls and residual risks.
Question: What must be recovered and how quickly?
Outcome: Recovery priorities, RTO, RPO, MBCO and dependencies.
Phase 4 — Business Continuity Strategy
Question: How will recovery requirements be achieved?
Outcome: Prevention, mitigation and recovery strategies.
Question: How will the strategy be executed during disruption?
Outcome: Business Continuity Plans and recovery procedures.
Question: Do the arrangements actually work?
Outcome: Validated capability, lessons learned and corrective actions.
Question: How will Damanat keep the capability effective?
Outcome: Governance, maintenance, assurance and continual improvement.
Together:
The Program Management phase completes the implementation framework for Business Continuity Management at The Saudi Mortgage Guarantees Services Company, but it does not represent the end of BCM.
Instead, it marks the transition from establishing BCM capability to sustaining organisational resilience over time.
The earlier phases provide Damanat with the fundamental building blocks:
Project Management establishes the implementation framework.
Risk Analysis and Review identifies disruption threats and vulnerabilities.
Business Impact Analysis establishes recovery priorities and requirements.
Business Continuity Strategy determines how those requirements will be achieved.
Plan Development translates strategies into actionable procedures.
Testing and Exercising demonstrates whether those arrangements can work.
Program Management ensures that everything remains current, governed, competent, tested and continually improved.
For Damanat, this final phase is particularly important because mortgage guarantee operations operate within a dynamic ecosystem of business processes, technology, financial institutions, suppliers, regulatory requirements, and operational risks.
A BCP that accurately reflects today's organisation may no longer be appropriate following a significant technology transformation, organisational restructuring, an outsourcing arrangement, or a change in a critical service provider.
Program Management provides the mechanism to identify and respond to those changes.
The objective should therefore be to establish a recurring cycle:
A mature BCM program should enable Damanat to demonstrate not merely that continuity documentation exists, but that:
Ultimately, the value of Program Management lies in maintaining readiness.
Damanat cannot predict every disruptive event that may occur. It can, however, maintain an organisation that understands its critical activities, recognises its dependencies, prepares appropriate recovery capabilities, exercises those capabilities and systematically learns from experience.
The complete BCM Planning Methodology for Damanat can therefore be summarised as:
The first six phases build and validate the capability.
The seventh phase keeps the capability alive.
Through disciplined Program Management, Business Continuity Management becomes an ongoing organisational capability that supports Damanat's ability to continue priority mortgage guarantee activities, meet stakeholder and regulatory expectations, and respond effectively to significant disruption.
| eBook 2: Implementing Business Continuity Management | ||||
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 |
| C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C10 |
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for BCM-300 Business Continuity Management Implementer [BCM-3] and BCM-5000 Business Continuity Management Expert Implementer [BCM-5]
|
Please feel free to send us a note if you have any questions. |
||