. .

From Complexity to Clarity: Mapping Interconnections and Interdependencies for Operational Resilience
OR BB P2S2_MII_05

[OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C6] Step 3 – Develop Mapping Framework

Operational Resilience eBook Series Full Banner

With the scope defined and data sources identified, the next step is to develop a structured mapping framework. This framework provides the blueprint for how interconnections and interdependencies will be organised, visualised, and analysed.

Without a clear framework, mapping efforts risk becoming:

  • Inconsistent across business units
  • Difficult to interpret and analyse
  • Misaligned with operational resilience objectives

A well-designed framework ensures that mapping is:

  • Structured and scalable
  • Consistent across the organisation
  • Aligned to Critical Business Services (CBS)
  • Usable for downstream activities such as scenario testing and recovery planning

 

New call-to-action

Moh Heng Goh
Operational Resilience Certified Planner-Specialist-Expert

New call-to-action

[P2] [S2] Chapter 6

Operational Resilience eBook Series Full Banner

Step 3 – Develop Mapping Framework

Introduction

0007 Hexagonal Hub and Spoke Service-Centric DiagramWith the scope defined and data sources identified, the next step is to develop a structured mapping framework. This framework provides the blueprint for how interconnections and interdependencies will be organised, visualised, and analysed.

Without a clear framework, mapping efforts risk becoming:

  • Inconsistent across business units[OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C6] Step 3 – Develop Mapping Framework
  • Difficult to interpret and analyse
  • Misaligned with operational resilience objectives

A well-designed framework ensures that mapping is:

  • Structured and scalable
  • Consistent across the organisation
  • Aligned to Critical Business Services (CBS)
  • Usable for downstream activities such as scenario testing and recovery planning

 

Purpose of the Chapter

OR Mapping Interconnections and Interdependencies BCMPedia

The purpose of this chapter is to:

  • Define the structure of interconnection mapping
  • Establish how CBS are broken down into manageable components
  • Introduce key elements such as data flows, system interfaces, and relationships
  • Provide a framework for capturing dependencies and connectivity

 

Defining the Mapping Structure

Hierarchical Structure

At the core of the mapping framework is a hierarchical structure that organises service delivery into logical layers:

CBS → Sub-CBS → Processes → Resources

 

Critical Business Services (CBS)
  • Represents the end-to-end service delivered to customers or stakeholders
  • Serves as the anchor point for all mapping activities

Example:

  • Payments & Funds Transfer Services

 

Sub-CBS
  • Breaks down CBS into distinct service components or functional segments
  • Enables more granular analysis

Example:

  • Payment Initiation
  • Authentication & Authorisation
  • Clearing & Settlement

 

Processes
  • Defines the activities required to deliver each Sub-CBS
  • Includes workflows, decision points, and execution steps

Example:

  • Transaction validation
  • Fraud screening
  • Funds availability check

 

Resources
  • Represents the assets required to execute processes, including:
    • People
    • Technology
    • Data
    • Facilities
    • Third parties

 

Benefits of the Hierarchical Structure
  • Provides clarity and organisation
  • Enables traceability from CBS to underlying components
  • Supports structured analysis of dependencies

 

Including Key Mapping Elements

Beyond the hierarchical structure, the framework must capture how components interact and depend on each other.

Data Flows

Definition

Data flows represent:

  • Movement of data between systems, processes, and entities

Importance

  • Identifies critical data dependencies
  • Highlights data integrity and availability risks

Examples

  • Customer data flowing from front-end applications to backend systems
  • Transaction data transmitted to payment networks

 

System Interfaces

Definition

System interfaces describe:

  • Points of interaction between applications and systems

Importance

  • Identifies integration dependencies
  • Highlights potential points of failure

Examples

  • API connections between mobile banking and core systems
  • Integration between payment engines and external networks

 

Upstream and Downstream Relationships

Definition

  • Upstream: Components that provide inputs to a process
  • Downstream: Components that depend on the outputs of a process

Importance

  • Enables understanding of dependency chains
  • Identifies cascading impact pathways

Examples

  • Upstream: Authentication system
  • Downstream: Payment processing system

 

Framework Components

The mapping framework must incorporate key components that enable comprehensive analysis.

Dependency Layers

Definition

Dependency layers categorise components into distinct groups, such as:

  • People
  • Processes
  • Technology
  • Data
  • Facilities
  • Third parties

Purpose

  • Provides structured classification of dependencies
  • Enables consistent mapping across CBS
Connectivity Flows

Definition

Connectivity flows describe:

  • How components interact and exchange information

Types of Flows

  • Process flows
  • Data flows
  • System interactions

Purpose

  • Visualises relationships between components
  • Identifies paths through which disruptions may propagate
Interaction Points

Definition

Interaction points are:

  • Specific locations where components connect or interact

Examples

  • API endpoints
  • System integration points
  • Manual handoffs between teams

Purpose

  • Highlights critical points of dependency
  • Identifies potential failure points

 

Building the Framework

Step-by-Step Approach

Organisations should:

  • Define CBS and Sub-CBS structure
  • Map processes supporting each Sub-CBS
  • Identify resources required for each process
  • Capture data flows and system interfaces
  • Map upstream and downstream relationships
  • Categorise dependencies into layers

 

Ensuring Consistency

To ensure consistency:

  • Use standard templates and definitions
  • Align with organisational taxonomy
  • Apply the same framework across all CBS

 

Validation

The framework should be validated through:

  • Stakeholder workshops
  • Cross-functional reviews
  • Alignment with actual operations

 

Practical Illustration

A simplified framework example:

CBS: Payments & Funds Transfer

Sub-CBS: Payment Processing

Process: Transaction validation

Resources:

  • Technology: Payment engine
  • Data: Transaction database
  • People: Operations team
  • Third party: Payment network

Connectivity:

  • Data flow between systems
  • API integration with external network
  • Upstream authentication system

 

New call-to-action

Developing a structured mapping framework is a critical step in operational resilience implementation, providing the foundation for consistent and effective interconnection mapping.

By defining:

  • A clear hierarchical structure (CBS → Sub-CBS → Processes → Resources)
  • Key elements such as data flows, system interfaces, and relationships
  • Core components including dependency layers, connectivity flows, and interaction points

Organisations can create a framework that is:

  • Comprehensive
  • Scalable
  • Aligned with operational realities

This framework enables organisations to move beyond fragmented mapping efforts and develop a coherent, end-to-end view of service delivery, supporting deeper analysis and resilience planning.

In the next chapter, we will explore Step 4: Map Processes and Resources, where this framework is applied to capture detailed operational dependencies across CBS.

 

Operational Resilience eBook Series Thin Banner

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
[OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C1] Introduction to Interconnections and Interdependencies [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C2] Why Mapping is Critical for Operational Resilience [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C3] Core Components of Interconnections and Dependencies [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C4] Step 1 – Define Scope of Mapping [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C5] Step 2- Identify Data Sources [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C6] Step 3 – Develop Mapping Framework
C7 C8 C9 C10 C11  C12
[OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C7] Step 4 – Map Processes and Resources [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C8] Step 5 – Map Interconnections and Interdependencies [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C9] Step 6 – Validate Mapping [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C10] Step 7 – Analyse Mapping Outputs [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C11] Mapping Tools and Techniques [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C12] Standard Templates and Data Structures
C13 C14 C15 C16 C17  C18
[OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C13] Integration with Operational Resilience Framework [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C14] Mapping Third-Party and Supply Chain Dependencies [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C15] Mapping for Digital and Cloud Environments [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C16] Common Challenges and Pitfalls [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C17] Case Study – Banking Sector CBS Mapping [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C18] Governance and Ownership of Mapping
C19 C20 C21 C22    
[OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C19] Using Mapping for Scenario Testing [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C20] Maintaining and Updating Mapping [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C21] Key Takeaways and Future Direction [OR] [P2] [S2] [MII] [C22] Back Cover    

 

More Information About OR-5000 [OR-5] or OR-300 [OR-3]

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.

BL-OR-3 Register Now BL-OR-3_Tell Me More BL-OR-3_View Schedule
BL-OR-5_Register Now BL-OR-5_Tell Me More  [BL-OR] [3-4-5] View Schedule
[BL-OR] [3] FAQ OR-300

If you have any questions, click to contact us.Email to Sales Team [BCM Institute]

FAQ BL-OR-5 OR-5000
OR Implementer Landing Page

New call-to-action

New call-to-action

 

Comments:

 

CTA Banner_OR

CTA Banner_ORA

CTA Banner_BCM

CTA Banner_ITDR

CTA Banner_CM