[OR] [C7] Overcoming Resistance and Securing Sponsorship

Chapter 7 

Overcoming Resistance and Securing Sponsorship

Introduction: Why Resistance Is Inevitable

Operational resilience (OR) reshapes how a financial institution views disruption, accountability, and systemic vulnerability. It introduces:

• Critical Business Service (CBS) prioritisation  
• Impact tolerance thresholds
• Severe but plausible scenario testing
• Cross-functional dependency transparency
• Board-level accountability

Such structural change naturally generates resistance.

Resistance is not necessarily opposition—it is often uncertainty, competing priorities, or perceived duplication. Supervisory expectations influenced by institutions such as the Bank for International Settlements have elevated operational resilience to strategic importance, but internal alignment does not occur automatically.

This chapter explores practical strategies to overcome resistance and secure sustained executive sponsorship.

Understanding the Sources of Resistance

Before addressing resistance, leaders must understand its root causes.

1. Perceived Duplication

“We already have Risk, BCM, and ITDR—why add another layer?”

2. Resource Competition

Business units prioritise revenue generation, digital transformation, and cost optimisation.

3. Fear of Exposure

Service mapping and stress testing may reveal weaknesses or concentration risks.

4. Governance Fatigue

Executives may resist new committees or reporting requirements.

5. Lack of Tangible ROI

Resilience investment is preventive and scenario-based, not revenue-generating.

Recognising these drivers allows targeted engagement rather than defensive justification.

Reframing Operational Resilience as Strategic Protection

Operational resilience must not be positioned as:

• A compliance project
• A regulatory reaction
• An extension of documentation exercises

Instead, it should be framed as:

• Protection of customer trust
• Safeguarding institutional reputation
• Prevention of financial contagion
• Strengthening operational discipline
• Enhancing strategic agility during crisis

When leadership understands OR as risk mitigation for franchise survival, sponsorship becomes more likely.

Securing Executive Sponsorship

Strong executive sponsorship is the single most important success factor.

Characteristics of an Effective Sponsor:

• Seniority (CRO, COO, Deputy CEO)
• Cross-functional influence
• Commitment to transparency
• Willingness to escalate issues to the Board
• Ability to allocate resources

To secure sponsorship:

1. Present regulatory expectations clearly.
2. Quantify potential financial and reputational impact.
3. Demonstrate linkage to customer harm prevention.
4. Propose a phased and manageable implementation roadmap.

Executive sponsors must see OR as risk mitigation for both the institution and their personal accountability.

Building a Compelling Business Case

A strong business case addresses four dimensions:

1. Regulatory Risk

Highlight supervisory expectations, thematic reviews, and peer enforcement actions.

2. Financial Risk

Model potential revenue loss from prolonged CBS disruption.

3. Reputational Risk

Demonstrate customer attrition and market confidence implications.

4. Operational Efficiency

Show how dependency mapping improves process transparency and reduces duplication.

Quantifying potential exposure transforms OR from abstract theory into measurable risk management.

Starting Small to Demonstrate Value

Enterprise-wide rollouts may overwhelm stakeholders.

A pragmatic approach is to:

• Select 1–2 CBS for pilot implementation
• Conduct full service mapping
• Run a severe scenario test
• Produce a concise management report
• Track remediation improvements

Early wins demonstrate practical value and reduce scepticism.

Proof of concept builds credibility.

Engaging Business Units Constructively

Business leaders may fear operational disruption from workshops and testing.

Effective engagement strategies include:

• Framing mapping sessions as collaborative risk reviews
• Scheduling workshops around operational cycles
• Emphasising shared accountability rather than fault-finding
• Highlighting interdependency risks that could affect their own performance

Operational resilience must be seen as supportive—not intrusive.

Encouraging a Culture of Transparent Vulnerability

Scenario testing reveals weaknesses. Leadership must foster an environment where:

• Gaps are documented without blame
• Escalation is encouraged
• Remediation is prioritised
• Lessons learned are institutionalised

Psychological safety enhances participation quality and testing realism.

If vulnerabilities are concealed, resilience maturity stagnates.

Aligning OR with Digital Transformation

Operational resilience should be embedded into:

• New product approval processes
• Cloud migration projects
• Outsourcing decisions
• Technology architecture reviews

When OR becomes part of transformation governance, it transitions from reactive assessment to proactive design.

This integration reduces resistance by positioning OR as an enabler of sustainable innovation.

Leveraging Board-Level Engagement

Board awareness accelerates executive alignment.

Effective Board engagement includes:

• Clear dashboards with impact tolerance indicators
• Trend analysis rather than raw data
• Scenario summaries with customer impact focus
• Transparent remediation tracking

When Boards actively challenge resilience assumptions, senior management commitment strengthens.

Board engagement reinforces sponsorship at the highest level.

Managing Governance Fatigue

To reduce resistance related to committee overload:

• Integrate OR reporting into existing Risk Committees
• Align reporting cycles with enterprise risk reporting
• Use concise and decision-oriented reporting packs
• Avoid duplicative documentation

Efficiency in governance design improves executive receptiveness.

Sustaining Sponsorship Over Time

Initial sponsorship may weaken once regulatory deadlines pass.

To sustain commitment:

• Maintain quarterly scenario testing cycles
• Report remediation closure rates
• Provide trend analysis on resilience indicators
• Link OR metrics to performance objectives

Operational resilience must remain visible within enterprise risk discussions.

Ongoing reporting discipline prevents momentum decline.

Indicators of Strong Sponsorship

Signs that sponsorship is firmly established include:

• Clear executive messaging supporting OR
• Resource allocation for mapping and testing
• Regular Board discussion on CBS
• Transparent reporting of vulnerabilities
• Accountability assigned for remediation
• Integration into strategic planning

When OR discussions become routine at senior levels, resistance diminishes.

Resistance is a natural response to structural change. It signals organisational impact.

Overcoming resistance requires:

• Strategic framing
• Clear business case articulation
• Executive sponsorship
• Cultural alignment
• Early value demonstration
• Consistent governance engagement

Operational resilience is not implemented through policy alone—it is embedded through leadership commitment.

Key Insight:

Operational resilience becomes sustainable not when resistance disappears, but when senior leadership recognises that protecting critical business services is a strategic obligation requiring visible sponsorship and institutional accountability.

Gain Competency: For organisations looking to accelerate their journey, BCM Institute’s training and certification programs, including the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course, provide in-depth insights and practical toolkits for effectively embedding this model.

More Information About Operational Resilience Course OR-5000 [OR-5] or OR-300 [OR-3]

To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer [OR-3] course and the  OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer [OR-5] course.