Operational resilience is no longer a supplementary control function—it is a strategic imperative for financial institutions operating in an increasingly volatile, digital, and interconnected environment.
For Agrobank, as a development financial institution supporting Malaysia’s agriculture ecosystem, resilience is inseparable from its mandate to sustain financing access, safeguard depositors’ confidence, and maintain trust across rural and agri-based communities.
Disruptions—whether cyber incidents, technology failures, supply chain interruptions, climate-related events, or third-party breakdowns—have direct implications on financial stability and customer livelihoods.
In Malaysia, expectations have evolved significantly under regulatory guidance issued by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM).
BNM’s operational resilience framework emphasises the ability of financial institutions to prevent, adapt, respond to, recover, and learn from disruptions, while continuing to deliver critical business services within defined impact tolerances.
Institutions are required to identify critical services, set measurable tolerance levels for disruption, conduct severe-but-plausible scenario testing, strengthen governance oversight, and continuously improve through lessons learned.
These expectations complement existing requirements under BNM’s Risk Management in Technology (RMiT), Outsourcing Policy Document, Business Continuity Management (BCM), and broader corporate governance frameworks.
This chapter is designed to provide readers with a clear understanding of Agrobank’s operational resilience journey, focusing on the rationale, structure, and execution of its three-phase methodology: Plan, Implement, and Sustain.
By reading this chapter, readers will gain insight into how strategic planning, operational execution, and cultural embedding converge to strengthen resilience.
They will also understand how regulatory requirements, such as BNM’s operational resilience guidelines, are translated into measurable impact tolerances, governance frameworks, scenario testing, and continuous improvement practices.
Ultimately, the chapter prepares readers to appreciate the interconnected nature of governance, risk management, and operational readiness in sustaining a resilient banking operation.
This eBook presents a structured, three-phase Operational Resilience Planning Methodology designed specifically for Agrobank:
The objective of this introductory chapter is to clarify how these three phases translate regulatory intent into actionable execution. By the end of this chapter, readers will understand:
This methodology ensures that resilience is not treated as a one-off compliance exercise, but as an evolving capability aligned to Agrobank’s strategic mandate and risk appetite.
This guide adopts a three-phase Operational Resilience Planning Methodology—Plan, Implement, and Sustain—to ensure resilience is not treated as a one-off compliance exercise, but as an embedded organisational capability.
This methodology aligns conceptually with:
Objective: Establish a strong strategic and governance foundation aligned with regulatory expectations.
Agrobank begins by evaluating its current resilience posture across governance, technology, third-party dependencies, BCM integration, cyber preparedness, and crisis management.
This includes benchmarking against BNM’s operational resilience principles and identifying alignment gaps with RMiT and BCM requirements.
A structured gap analysis compares current capabilities against regulatory expectations, such as:
This stage highlights control deficiencies, documentation gaps, and capability shortfalls.
A multi-year roadmap is developed to prioritise remediation initiatives, technology enhancements, policy updates, and capability building. The roadmap integrates operational resilience with enterprise risk management, IT strategy, and digital transformation programmes.
Operational resilience metrics must align with Agrobank’s board-approved risk appetite. For example:
BNM expects a clear articulation of impact tolerances tied to financial stability and customer harm considerations.
Clear accountability is established at the Board, Senior Management, and Operational levels. This includes:
This ensures operational resilience is embedded within enterprise governance rather than siloed within IT or BCM functions.
Objective: Translate strategic direction into measurable and testable operational capabilities.
Agrobank identifies services whose disruption would cause intolerable harm to customers, the financial system, or its development mandate. Examples may include:
BNM explicitly requires the identification of critical business services as the foundation of operational resilience.
Each critical service is mapped end-to-end, identifying:
This supports compliance with RMiT and Outsourcing Policy expectations around third-party risk visibility.
Impact tolerance statements define the maximum tolerable disruption level. For example:
BNM expects tolerances to be measurable and customer-centric.
Agrobank conducts severe-but-plausible scenario testing, such as:
Testing evaluates whether critical services remain within impact tolerances.
Post-incident and post-testing reviews identify improvement opportunities. Lessons learned are incorporated into policies, technology upgrades, training, and governance reporting.
Objective: Institutionalise resilience as a continuous and evolving organisational capability.
Operational resilience becomes embedded in leadership messaging, performance metrics, and management accountability. Staff recognise that resilience is everyone’s responsibility.
Clear communication protocols are established for regulators, customers, partners, and internal stakeholders during disruptions. Transparent and timely communication supports trust and regulatory confidence.
Regular resilience training programmes are conducted for:
BNM expects senior leadership to understand and challenge resilience assumptions.
Periodic self-assessments measure compliance with BNM’s operational resilience framework. These include independent validation of:
Internal Audit or external independent reviewers evaluate the robustness of Agrobank’s operational resilience framework. Findings are reported to the Board Audit Committee to ensure independent assurance.
Operational resilience at Agrobank is not merely about surviving disruption—it is about sustaining confidence, fulfilling its developmental mandate, and protecting Malaysia’s agricultural financing ecosystem.
In an environment shaped by digital transformation, climate risk, and increasing regulatory expectations, resilience must be measurable, governed, tested, and continuously strengthened.
The three-phase methodology—Plan, Implement, Sustain—provides a structured pathway from regulatory compliance to operational excellence. It ensures that:
By moving deliberately from framework to execution, Agrobank positions itself not only to comply with regulatory standards issued by Bank Negara Malaysia, but to lead in resilience maturity among Malaysian financial institutions.
The journey does not end with documentation or initial testing. True operational resilience is demonstrated through sustained capability, proactive governance, and adaptive learning.
Through disciplined execution of this methodology, Agrobank strengthens its institutional durability, enhances stakeholder trust, and ensures uninterrupted support to Malaysia’s agricultural community—today and into the future.
Blogs marked [x] are under construction.
Building Operational Resilience at Agrobank: From Framework to Execution
|
|||
| eBook 2: Implementing Operational Resilience for Agrobank |
|||
| C1 | C2 [x] | C8 [x] | C14 [x] |
Building Operational Resilience at Agrobank: From Framework to Execution |
||||||
| ebook 2: Implementing Operational Resilience Agrobank | ||||||
| eBook 1 | C1 | C20 [x] | C21 [x] | eBook 2 | eBook 3 | |
| "Plan" Phase of the Operational Resilience Planning Methodology |
||||||
| C2 [x] | C3 [x] | C4 [x] | C5 [x] | C6 [x] | C7 [x] | |
| "Implement" Phase of the Operational Resilience Planning Methodology | ||||||
| C8 [x] | C9 [x] | C10 [x] | C11 [x] | C12 [x] | C13 [x] | |
| "Sustain" Phase of the Operational Resilience Planning Methodology | ||||||
| C14 [x] | C15 [x] | C16 [x] | C17 [x] | C18 [x] | C19 [x] | |
For organisations looking to accelerate their journey, BCM Institute’s training and certification programs, including the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course, provide in-depth insights and practical toolkits for effectively embedding this model.
To learn more about the course and schedule, click the buttons below for the OR-300 Operational Resilience Implementer course and the OR-5000 Operational Resilience Expert Implementer course.
|
If you have any questions, click to contact us. |
||
|
|