Source: ISO 22301:2019 – Societal Security – Business Continuity Management Systems - Requirements - clause 3.4
This definition can be simplified as an organization-wide discipline and a complete set of processes identifying potential impacts that threaten an organization. It provides a capability for an effective response that safeguards the interests of its major stakeholders and reputation.
Business continuity management (BCM) for venture capitalist (VC) firms involves establishing strategies and processes to ensure the organization can continue its critical operations and fulfil its investment objectives, even during disruptive events or crises. VC firms handle substantial amounts of capital and investments, making it crucial to have a robust plan to mitigate risks and safeguard their operations and assets.
In the context of VC firms, BCM includes assessing and identifying potential risks that could impact the firm's ability to operate effectively. These risks may range from natural disasters, cyber-attacks, and economic downturns, to operational failures. Once identified, VC firms develop strategies and contingency plans to minimize disruptions and quickly recover from these incidents. This involves defining roles and responsibilities, implementing backup systems, establishing communication protocols, and having an offsite location to resume operations if the primary office becomes inaccessible.
A comprehensive BCM plan for VC firms also involves ensuring the safety and security of sensitive data, both financial and intellectual property. This may include data encryption, secure backup storage, and regular testing of disaster recovery and business continuity plans. By implementing effective BCM, VC firms can demonstrate their commitment to protecting their investors' interests, maintaining trust, and safeguarding the stability of their investments and the overall financial ecosystem.
One such way to prepare is to adopt a BCM Planning Methodology. Click the BCM Planning methodology picture to learn more.
The BCM planning methodology, like any other planning process, provides a framework for requirements, effort, and deliverables, each phase leading into the next in an endlessly repeating cycle. The roles and responsibilities are spelt out in the BCM framework.
The BCM Planning Methodology (Goh, 2015) is divided into various steps. The key is to divide the entire process so that it is manageable.
The types of threats highlighted are as follows:
Click the "Understanding Your Organisation" icon to learn more about the list of business functions.
A set of criteria is developed to guide this analysis. Business function criticality will determine the priority and urgency with which the disruption is dealt with. |
A set of criteria is developed to guide this analysis. Business function criticality will determine the priority and urgency with which the disruption is dealt with.
As mentioned in the earlier blog, examples of such business function should include Administration, Human Resources and Finance, which is not external facing. These functions are often centralized or even outsourced; their identification and prioritization should be considered part of the BCM scope.
The plan from the plan development phase is run through simulations, where it is ultimately graded based on criteria. If a test or exercise's results are deemed unsatisfactory, any error or omission it might have will need to be corrected.
Click the "Overview of Training-led BCM Implementation" for the detailed briefing. Note that this course has value-added services to meet the minimum BCM requirement. After the reading, you may want to know about the funding details from SkillsFuture Singapore (SSG). |
If you are a Singapore-based company or Singaporean and Permanent Resident, you can opt to receive BCM training via:
WSQ BCM Course Funding: Course Code: BCM-310; BCM-320; BCM-330 | Non-WSQ BCM Course: BCM-5000 for assigned Project Manager |
Goh, M. H. (2015). Business Continuity Management Planning Methodology. International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 6, 9–16. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijdrbc.2015.6.02