Business Continuity Management: Framework vs Policy

Decoding the Distinction: Business Continuity Management Framework vs Business Continuity Management Policy

Two crucial elements in BCM Planning are pivotal in safeguarding an organisation's operations during adverse events: the BCM Framework and the BCM Policy.

While they are interrelated and complement each other, they serve distinct purposes and functions within an organisation's approach to resilience and recovery.

Understanding the Business Continuity Management Policy

It is a formalized statement articulating the organisation's stance on managing and responding to disruptions.

The policy defines the organisation's overall philosophy and strategy concerning business continuity and establishes the context for further planning and implementation.

Typically, a BCM policy covers the following aspects:

Statement of Commitment

A concise declaration reflecting the organisation's commitment to ensuring business continuity and its significance.

Scope and Applicability

Defining the boundaries and applicability of the policy across different functions, units, or subsidiaries within the organisation.

Roles and Responsibilities

Outlining the roles, responsibilities, and accountability of individuals and teams involved in implementing the BCM policy.

Policy Objectives

Enumerating the specific objectives the organization aims to achieve through implementing the BCM policy.

Key Elements of a Business Continuity Management Framework

On the other hand, a BCM framework represents a structured approach, encompassing the methodologies, processes, guidelines, and tools necessary to establish a resilient and adaptive business continuity program.

Its comprehensive structure guides the organisation through the entire business continuity lifecycle, from risk assessment and planning to recovery and continuous improvement.

Key Components of a BCM Framework

The key components of a BCM framework typically include:

Risk Assessment (RAR) and Business Impact Analysis (BIA)

Identifying risks and evaluating their potential impacts on critical business functions.

Business Continuity Strategies (BCS) and Plan Development (PD)

Formulating strategies and detailed plans to maintain essential operations during disruptions.

Testing and Exercising (TE)

Conducting regular tests, training sessions, and simulated exercises to ensure the effectiveness of the BCM plans and enhance preparedness.

Program Management

Managing and continuously improving the business continuity program with continuous review, update, and enhancement of the BCM framework to align with changing organizational needs and external factors.

Governance and Compliance

Establishing governance structures and ensuring compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards.

Distinguishing the Two Pillars of Preparedness

In summary, the primary distinction between a BCM framework and a BCM policy lies in their scope, purpose, and level of detail:

Scope and Purpose

The BCM policy sets the organisation's overarching strategic direction and commitment towards business continuity.

The BCM framework provides a structured approach and operational guidance to implement the strategic objectives outlined in the policy.

Level of Detail

The BCM policy and the BCM framework are essential components of a successful business continuity program. While the policy provides direction and commitment, the framework translates that commitment into actionable strategies and plans that ensure business resilience in disruptions.

Together, they form a robust foundation for an organization to thrive amidst uncertainties and swiftly recover from adverse events.

Conclusion

A successful business continuity program thrives on a symbiotic relationship between a well-defined BCM policy and a robust BCM framework.

The BCM policy sets the strategic vision and commitment, while the BCM framework translates this vision into actionable strategies, plans, and activities for a resilient and responsive organization.

By integrating these elements into their operational fabric, organizations can endure disruptions, swiftly recover, and thrive in an ever-changing business landscape.

Related Topics